Considering archiving/rewrite in favor of official CKAN Docker compose setup #13
rzmk
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
A while back one of the reasons I set up the
ckan-devstallerproject was to speed up installing CKAN for extension development since I used to use a virtual machine approach where each project had a separate virtual machine that needed CKAN installed. Nowadays I simply use a modified version of the ckan/ckan-docker repo to help develop ckanext-gztr and I would think with enough polish that theckan/ckan-dockerrepo would be more ideal for CKAN extension development. Setting up environments based on that polished setup could work. There is also ckan-pilot by Keitaro that is an alternative to ckan-devstaller (though I had issues when using it). I also think it'd be good to document how to set up a development environment in the extensions modernization docs using theckan/ckan-dockersetup and perhaps automate things based on that setup.So either archiving/deprecating ckan-devstaller or doing a codebase rewrite to focus on using
ckan/ckan-docker(and/or a modified version(s) of it) could be reasonable, if I ever get the time.All reactions