You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue #343 replaced the Hermite-Legendre global JFNK step with a structured split/Cayley integrator and produced an approximately 150x long-horizon time-to-solution improvement. The widened [2, 18] Legendre window also keeps the current warm bump-on-tail case bounded through t=700, whereas [4, 15] becomes boundary-contaminated and fails near t=659.
The next result should exploit Legendre structure rather than stop at a longer solver benchmark. The target is a JPP-style physics paper on long-time nonlinear electrostatic wave-particle interactions, with driven nonlinear EPWs as the controlled theory problem and bump-on-tail as the autonomous long-time test. Nonlinear SRS should remain a separate PoP application paper.
Research question
How does velocity-space free energy flow through a localized Legendre hierarchy as an EPW crosses from linear Landau damping into nonlinear trapping, and can that mode-space description predict long-time fidelity and failure relative to grid Vlasov?
Legendre theory and diagnostics
For
$$\delta f(x,v,t) = \sum_m B_m(x,t)\,\xi_m(v),$$
the basis normalization gives a Legendre free-energy-like norm proportional to
$$W_L = (v_b-v_a)\int dx\sum_m |B_m|^2/2.$$
With gamma=0.5 applied to all Legendre modes, the local force/penalty generator is skew-symmetric. Use that structure to derive and implement an exact modal transfer budget, including:
W_m(t): Legendre spectrum, optionally resolved by spatial Fourier mode;
Pi_M(t): cumulative conservative flux through Legendre cutoff M;
Hermite-to-Legendre injection from the coupling term;
Legendre hypercollision removal;
contribution from the post-step conservation correction;
budget residual and sign/normalization unit tests.
The useful physical test is whether forward Legendre flux during phase mixing arrests or reverses when trapping begins, and whether the reversal/oscillation timescale follows the bounce frequency.
Add a projection diagnostic for a grid-Vlasov reference:
This should make spectra and fluxes comparable in the same representation rather than relying only on pointwise phase-space error.
Campaign A: driven nonlinear EPW
Use the existing longitudinal Ex driver and a near-Maxwellian initial state.
Scan a small set such as k*lambda_D = {0.26, 0.30, 0.34, 0.38}.
Scan driver amplitude across omega_B << |gamma_L|, omega_B ~ |gamma_L|, and omega_B >> |gamma_L|.
Turn the driver off cleanly and evolve for many bounce periods.
Center the Legendre window on v_phi; relate its minimum safe width to the nonlinear trapping/separatrix width.
Run matched grid-Vlasov references.
Compare:
EPW envelope and linear damping rate;
nonlinear frequency shift and bounce period;
plateau/trapping width and trapped-particle fraction;
W_m, Pi_M, Hermite-to-Legendre injection, and hypercollision removal;
coarse-grained distribution and field harmonics after drive-off.
Look for collapse of the trapping transition and Legendre-flux reversal when time is normalized by omega_B^-1.
Campaign B: long-time bump-on-tail
Extend the validated [2, 18], Nh=32, Nl=128 run directly to at least t=1200 (preferably t=2000).
Run a matched, converged grid-Vlasov reference.
Use at least three beam densities or perturbation amplitudes so the result is a physics scan rather than a single benchmark.
Compare long-time field spectrum, bounce dynamics, plateau/island geometry, trapped/passing populations, Legendre flux, and coarse-grained VDF.
Determine whether boundary occupancy and modal flux predict loss of validity before field observables fail.
Required convergence and ablations
dt = 0.1, 0.05;
Nl = 128, 256 and at least one Nh refinement;
multiple Legendre windows, including [4, 15] and [2, 18] for the current discriminator;
sensitivity to nu_H and nu_L, treating them explicitly as artificial cutoff controls rather than physical collision frequencies;
conservation-correction magnitude and an ablation where practical;
converged Vlasov velocity resolution and declared coarse-graining/filter scale.
At long times, do not require pointwise agreement of arbitrarily fine Vlasov filaments. Use field observables, projected modal budgets, trapped-particle observables, Casimir/entropy-like diagnostics, and distributions compared at a controlled coarse-graining scale.
Completion criteria
Legendre modal budget derived and documented.
Spectrum, flux, source, sink, correction, and residual diagnostics implemented with tests.
Grid-Vlasov-to-Hermite/Legendre projection implemented and tested.
Driven-EPW amplitude scan spans linear damping through strong trapping.
Flux reversal/arrest is either demonstrated and related to bounce dynamics, or cleanly ruled out.
Bump-on-tail reaches t>=1200 in both solvers with convergence evidence.
Artificial-collision, timestep, resolution, and window sensitivity are quantified.
Separate PoP paper: apply the validated representation and diagnostics to inhomogeneous nonlinear SRS, reflectivity/saturation, nonlinear detuning, and hot-electron production.
Motivation
Issue #343 replaced the Hermite-Legendre global JFNK step with a structured split/Cayley integrator and produced an approximately 150x long-horizon time-to-solution improvement. The widened
[2, 18]Legendre window also keeps the current warm bump-on-tail case bounded throught=700, whereas[4, 15]becomes boundary-contaminated and fails neart=659.The next result should exploit Legendre structure rather than stop at a longer solver benchmark. The target is a JPP-style physics paper on long-time nonlinear electrostatic wave-particle interactions, with driven nonlinear EPWs as the controlled theory problem and bump-on-tail as the autonomous long-time test. Nonlinear SRS should remain a separate PoP application paper.
Research question
Legendre theory and diagnostics
For
the basis normalization gives a Legendre free-energy-like norm proportional to
With
gamma=0.5applied to all Legendre modes, the local force/penalty generator is skew-symmetric. Use that structure to derive and implement an exact modal transfer budget, including:W_m(t): Legendre spectrum, optionally resolved by spatial Fourier mode;Pi_M(t): cumulative conservative flux through Legendre cutoffM;The useful physical test is whether forward Legendre flux during phase mixing arrests or reverses when trapping begins, and whether the reversal/oscillation timescale follows the bounce frequency.
Add a projection diagnostic for a grid-Vlasov reference:
This should make spectra and fluxes comparable in the same representation rather than relying only on pointwise phase-space error.
Campaign A: driven nonlinear EPW
Use the existing longitudinal
Exdriver and a near-Maxwellian initial state.k*lambda_D = {0.26, 0.30, 0.34, 0.38}.omega_B << |gamma_L|,omega_B ~ |gamma_L|, andomega_B >> |gamma_L|.v_phi; relate its minimum safe width to the nonlinear trapping/separatrix width.Compare:
W_m,Pi_M, Hermite-to-Legendre injection, and hypercollision removal;Look for collapse of the trapping transition and Legendre-flux reversal when time is normalized by
omega_B^-1.Campaign B: long-time bump-on-tail
[2, 18],Nh=32,Nl=128run directly to at leastt=1200(preferablyt=2000).Required convergence and ablations
dt = 0.1, 0.05;Nl = 128, 256and at least oneNhrefinement;[4, 15]and[2, 18]for the current discriminator;nu_Handnu_L, treating them explicitly as artificial cutoff controls rather than physical collision frequencies;At long times, do not require pointwise agreement of arbitrarily fine Vlasov filaments. Use field observables, projected modal budgets, trapped-particle observables, Casimir/entropy-like diagnostics, and distributions compared at a controlled coarse-graining scale.
Completion criteria
t>=1200in both solvers with convergence evidence.Publication boundary
JPP paper: Legendre-space transport theory; driven nonlinear EPW; long-time bump-on-tail; Vlasov validation; structured-integrator performance.
Separate PoP paper: apply the validated representation and diagnostics to inhomogeneous nonlinear SRS, reflectivity/saturation, nonlinear detuning, and hot-electron production.
Related work