Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
|
This would be a bit easier to answer if we had more info about your work environment, etc. For starters, you might like to investigate the available plug-ins for various editors that enable those editors to run Vale styles on the fly. Many of the writers in my team use VS Code, and they use a plug-in that displays what Vale believes are issues in the editing window. (I don't use VS Code myself so can't say much more than that. I use Vale on the CLI.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe start here. Scroll down to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I apologize for asking a general question, and appreciate your response. I asked my questions because I would like to have a solution for my colleagues' needs and my own. I think a lot of other people who are not familiar with the command line, Vim, or Emacs are likely to have similar questions. My question was based on the Integrations section of the documentation. That is what I meant when I referred to well maintained and well documented. As you noted, VS Code seems like it should be the primary choice. Unfortunately, there are numerous, significant disclaimers and limitations associated with the Vale + VS Code package, the present documentation presents installation and use challenges even for experienced developers, and I have not been able to make it work with VSCodium. Please know that I am not complaining about this project, which I appreciate. My only interest is in finding a path that is a bit more beginner friendly and allows for greater privacy. I had Vale working well with JetBrains WriterSide when it was a standalone program. Now that WriterSide is only a plugin, I have not found a good combination of ease of installation, ease of use, and price considerations. The Obsidian client has not been updated in four years and was archived by its owner over two years ago. The Sublime client has not been updated in 12 months and only has 223 installs, so it seems sensible to worry about its viability. It seems clear that Vale has focused in the past on well documented, well supported integrations with FOSS or low cost, beginner friendly clients. Are there integrations or is there documentation that I am missing or questioning unnecessarily? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@bonfield I used to be a legal and business editor and proofreader, and I used PerfectIt in Word. PerfectIt is a plugin/add-on for Word (paid for, but affordable) that provides several style guides and automated error checking. When I first stumbled on Vale, my first thoughts were it was a coder's PerfectIt... Anyway - unsure if you use Microsoft stuff, but hope that my suggestion is useful. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So for ages I have been trialling "similar" tools to Vale and recently compiled some, I am also looking at Antidote. But I agree, Vale has never worked so well for less technical people or tools. There is now my MCP server, but that's still quite technical, for the time being. I am also trying to slowly work on a Vale Desktop type tool, but that is a lot of work and needs a different version for each platform… So, tldr; it would be great to get Vale to less technical audiences, and there is slow progress, but it's not there yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been trying to make Vale part of my workflow for about two years, and do it in a way that could include my less technical colleagues. While they know Markdown, they aren't going to learn Emacs or Vim, and would prefer a GUI that feels familiar and is relatively easy to learn. Is there a well maintained, well documented, GUI integration with FOSS or low cost editing software that makes easy things easy?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions