Run the rubric in AI_READINESS.md against the current repo head (commit d456df8) and record the score. Track delta after each phase lands so we know whether the uplift is converting into real numbers, not just intention.
Builder's Trap? → measurement-of-measurement. Only worth doing if the score actually drives subsequent prioritization. If we find ourselves scoring without changing what we'd work on next, kill this. The rubric's protocols are designed for reproducible scoring, but the score is a signal, not a goal.
Checklist
Acceptance
- Baseline score recorded with reproducible commands + outputs.
- Each delta entry references the commit that triggered it.
- After 2 phases land, an explicit decision is made about whether to continue scoring.
Refs
- Rubric:
AI_READINESS.md.
- Baseline commit: `d456df8`.
- Anti-pattern guard: the rubric document itself warns against "vanity score chasing."
Run the rubric in
AI_READINESS.mdagainst the current repo head (commitd456df8) and record the score. Track delta after each phase lands so we know whether the uplift is converting into real numbers, not just intention.Builder's Trap? → measurement-of-measurement. Only worth doing if the score actually drives subsequent prioritization. If we find ourselves scoring without changing what we'd work on next, kill this. The rubric's protocols are designed for reproducible scoring, but the score is a signal, not a goal.
Checklist
AI_READINESS.mdcriteria A1–E2 (12 criteria) against commitd456df8. Each protocol is a shell command embedded in the rubric.AI_READINESS_SCORE.md(sibling ofAI_READINESS.md) or in a section of the existing file. Include per-criterion score, total, tier, and the date + commit SHA.Acceptance
Refs
AI_READINESS.md.