How do we handle availability?

[madsmtm]

In Apple's Objective-C headers, most classes and methods are annotated with an availability attribute such as API_AVAILABLE(macos(10.13), ios(11.0), watchos(4.0), tvos(11.0)); this is absolutely a great idea (!!!), it very cleanly allows you to mark which APIs you may use, and which ones are not usable on your current deployment target.

We should have some way of doing the same as @available in Objective-C; however, since we are not a compiler like clang is, this is quite tricky!

A quick demonstration of what I want:

1. Declare an API which is only available on a specific deployment target

   #[cfg_available(macos = 10.10, ..)]
   #[sel(doSomething:)]
   fn doSomething(&self, arg: i32);

2. Prevent the user from using said API if their deployment target is not high enough:

   // MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7
   obj.doSomething(32); // Fails (ideally at compile time, otherwise with debug assertions at runtime)
   
   // MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.10
   obj.doSomething(32); // Works

3. Allow the user (usually libraries) to use the API if they've verified that the target version is high enough (this uses a dynamic runtime check except if the deployment target is high enough). Done in Implement runtime availability checking #661.

   if available!(macos = 10.12, ..) { // Anything higher than what `doSomething` needs
       obj.doSomething(32); // Works no matter the deployment target
   }

4. When declaring a class and overriding methods, if you know when the method was added (and hence, when it will be called), communicate this availability to the body of the function:

   #[cfg_available(macos = 10.10, ..)] // Same as superclass'
   #[sel(doSomething:)]
   fn doSomething(&self, arg: i32) {
       // Allowed to do things only available on macOS 10.10 and above
   }

For this, Contexts and capabilities come to mind, similar to how it would be useful for autorelease pools, but alas, we can't do that yet, so this will probably end up as a debug assertions runtime check. rust-lang/rfcs#3750 would also be nice to have.

See also the original SSheldon/rust-objc#111, a WIP implementation can be found in #212.

[madsmtm]

There are effectively two versions that affect availability and what we should do: the deployment target and the SDK version.

To illustrate, let's assume an API fn foo() { ... } that's introduced in some version i, later deprecated in some version d, and finally removed in some version r*.

Deployment target	SDK version	fn declaration	foo()	if_available(introduced_version_or_above) { foo() }
..i	..i	None	Fails	Fails
..i	i..d	fn foo() { assert_available(introduced_version); ... }	Panics	Success
..i	d..r	#[deprecated] fn foo() { assert_available(introduced_version); ... }	Warning + Panics	Warning
..i	r..	None*	Fails	Fails
i..d	i..d	fn foo() { ... }	Success	Success
i..d	d..r	#[deprecated] fn foo() { ... }	Warning	Warning
i..d	r..	None*	Fails	Fails
d..r	d..r	#[deprecated] fn foo() { ... }	Warning	Warning
d..r	r..	None*	Fails	Fails
r..	r..	None*	Fails	Fails

*Note that I don't really know a case where an API has been removed, but we can handle it if need be.

[madsmtm]

From the above, we can see that the logic in cfg_available is basically:
Deployment target < Introduced version -> Add assertion that the user has checked the availability before calling
Deprecation version <= SDK version -> Mark the item as deprecated
Removal version <= SDK version -> Remove the item

[madsmtm]

We should similarly try to support such attributes on each impl item

EDIT: Moved to #285

[madsmtm]

We need to do both a static and a dynamic check - the static one is fairly straightforward, but I'm unsure of how we should do the dynamic one?

I would have thought that clang just called some library function, but it's actually implemented as a compiler builtin, which calls into CoreFoundation and reads /System/Library/CoreServices/SystemVersion.plist, see os_version_check.c.

Do we really need that as well? Or can we perhaps get by with just reading kCFCoreFoundationVersionNumber (or maybe NSFoundationVersionNumber)?

[madsmtm]

Actually, turns out the @available in Objective-C is much newer than i thought - see the initial proposal here.

We could reconsider the check to be just is_available!(MyClass::doSomething), but I think the reasoning in that post (better for control-flow) apply to us as well, at least if we do end up getting something like contexts and capabilities. The optimization potential once the user switches to a higher deployment target is also nice.

[madsmtm]

Swift's #available works similarly, see Availability.swift and Availability.mm.

Though they use (a weak symbol to) os_system_version_get_current_version, are we allowed to do that too? And where is that even defined?

[madsmtm]

There's a new RFC that would help with OS compile-time detection: rust-lang/rfcs#3036 rust-lang/rfcs#3379 rust-lang/rfcs#3750 (though we'd still want a macro for the compile-time + runtime detection fallback)