Repository navigation
Make upstream integrations version-adaptive to stop cross-component regressions #249
Description
Activity
"a duplicated passphrase-strength check drifted from the behavior Tails itself accepts;"
That's not true, Tails always accepted any passphrase, bails added the passphrase-strength check to warn on weak passphrases, something Tails does not do (but could! should it?)
menu actions assumed gnome-terminal, while current Tails provides kgx instead;
What's the solution to call whatever terminal the future tails may use? gtk-open?
cACK Make CipherStick a thin, version-adaptive integration layer so routine releases of Bitcoin Core, Tails, GNOME, Debian, Python, python-codex32, and JoinMarket do not require whack-a-mole fixes across unrelated scripts.
should python-codex32 be pinned into our bails repository's source tree? I believe this project gets considerably more attention and review it would be good if cloning this project cloned python-codex32 master as well.
That way we don't have an obscure file downloading a dependency (besides Bitcoin core) that handles secrets.
- added 14 commits that reference this issue
on Sep 27, 2026 16 remaining items
- added a commit that references this issue
on Sep 30, 2026 BenWestgate commented
on Sep 30, 2026 OwnerAuthorMore actionsTails 7.13 GUI follow-ups are tracked upstream in
python-codex32: #43 (type back the recorded fingerprint), #71 (neutral card-count choices), #72 (paper-card group layout), #73 (wallet-encryption guidance), #74 (fit final wallet identity on one screen), #75 (compact home-window sizing), and #76 (distinct home-action artwork). The extra-group repair, recovery-vs-repair highlighting, and readback-prefix/cursor findings are already corrected in the current #65 GUI candidate and should not be duplicated. Refs #230.BenWestgate commented
on Sep 30, 2026 OwnerAuthorMore actionsAdditional Tails 7.13 follow-ups are now tracked: Bails #291 for a future Tails-owned passphrase-verification boundary that returns only success/failure, and python-codex32 #75/#76 for compact home-window sizing and distinct home-action artwork. #289 remains the current practical trainer fix; #291 is hardening, not a merge blocker.
- added 12 commits that reference this issue
on Oct 1, 2026
Problem
#240 and the Tails 7.13 testing in #230 exposed one architectural problem: CipherStick integration code was coupled to incidental details of particular upstream releases, so a Tails/Debian/GNOME/Python update broke several unrelated-looking flows.
Examples include hard-coded Python minor-version paths, assumptions about desktop executables, duplicated Tails policy, brittle GUI/layout assumptions, and scattered Bitcoin Core/codex32 compatibility logic.
This conflicts with the maintenance model we want from Tails:
Goal
Keep CipherStick a thin, version-adaptive integration layer so routine releases of Bitcoin Core, Tails, GNOME, Debian, Python, python-codex32, and JoinMarket do not require whack-a-mole fixes across unrelated scripts.
This is a meta issue. Implementation belongs in the focused canonical issues below; avoid adding another symptom issue when one of these boundaries already owns the fix.
Canonical workstreams
Tails / desktop / persistence
Bitcoin Core integration
dbcachewithout persisting policy in Core dynamic settingssettings.jsonwrappedlaunch layeribd-progress/backup-wizard watchercodex32 integration
Focused UI regressions
Other compatibility-facing cleanup
codex32naming sweep once overlapping branches landExternally opened tester reports remain open and can be referenced by the canonical implementation issue/PR without being closed as duplicates.
Acceptance criteria
Design rule
When several regressions appear after an upstream release, identify and repair the shared dependency boundary first. Keep one canonical issue per coherent fix/PR and close maintainer-opened symptom duplicates into it.
Refs #230, #240.