Chore/migrate to gh actions from circleci 2 [QA]

[AnnaFYZ]

This is a:

• ✨ New feature - new behaviour has been implemented
• 🐛 Bug fix - existing behaviour has been made to behave
• ♻️ Refactor - the behaviour has not changed, just the implementation
• ✅ Test backfill - tests for existing behaviour were added but the behaviour itself hasn't changed
• ⚙️ Chore - maintenance task, behaviour and implementation haven't changed

Description

replacing circleCi yml with github workflows

• Purpose -

Migrate to Github actions from CircleCI because we don't need CircleCI
Use IAM role than IAM user

• How to check - Before merging this PR, we can only check the test job (on CI.yml).
  It’s only after the PR is merged that we can check if the qa job (on CI.yml) and build-and-deploy (on deploy.yml) works.

Links

• https://github.com/CodeYourFuture/devops_team/issues/86
• https://github.com/CodeYourFuture/devops_team/issues/135

Author checklist

• I have written a title that reflects the relevant ticket
• I have written a description that says what the PR does and how to validate it
• I have linked to the project board ticket (and any related PRs/issues) in the Links section
• I have added a link to this PR to the ticket
• I have made the PR to qa from a branch named <category>/<name>, e.g. feature/edit-spaceships or bugfix/restore-oxygen
• I have completed the manual tests described here
• I have requested reviewers here and in my team chat channel

• I have spoken with my PM or TL about any parts of this task that may have become out-of-scope, or any additional improvements that I now realise may benefit my project
• I have added tests, or new tests were not required
• I have updated any documentation (e.g. diagrams, schemas), or documentation updates were not required

[susanssky]

Although I have approved but I have called @pedroguima to grant the admin privilege to the devops team otherwise i can't unlock circleci-check on the branch

[textbook]

These are @susanssky's own changes from #199, right? So surely someone else should be reviewing them, otherwise we're achieving none of the goals of code review.

[AnnaFYZ]

These are @susanssky's own changes from #199, right? So surely someone else should be reviewing them, otherwise we're achieving none of the goals of code review.

of course. we agreed that dev/ops team will review as we need minimum two reviewers anyway

[Agnes4Him]

Wondering if details such as bucket, distribution, region, role, and url can be saved as variables and then referenced in the pipeline that way instead of directly.

[susanssky]

Wondering if details such as bucket, distribution, region, role, and url can be saved as variables and then referenced in the pipeline that way instead of directly.

Honestly, if I’m the person updating the workflow, I really don’t want to see var.SUBDOMAIN every time and then have to click on Settings → Environment variables manually just to check the real value.
Also, the DevOps team doesn’t have admin rights in the forms repo or the application process repo.(I have called Pedro about it)

[Agnes4Him]

Okay, then.

[bp7968h]

Looks all fine to me as, thanks for the work.