🎨 Palette: HTML 리포트 접근성 및 UX 개선 by seonghobae · Pull Request #125 · ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm

seonghobae · 2026-07-09T19:05:12Z

💡 What (무엇을)

HTML 보고서에서 사용자 경험과 접근성을 향상시키는 일련의 소규모 UX 개선을 수행했습니다. 여기에는 시맨틱 HTML 태그의 적용, 보조 기기를 위한 ARIA 속성 활용, 그리고 키보드 포커스의 세련된 처리가 포함됩니다.

🎯 Why (왜)

시맨틱 태그(<dl>): <article>, <span> 같은 범용 태그 대신 <dl>, <dt>, <dd>를 사용하여 데이터와 값 사이의 명확한 구조를 제공하여 스크린 리더 사용자의 이해도를 높였습니다.
aria-hidden="true": 순수하게 시각적인 진행률 막대 트랙이 스크린 리더에서 읽히는 것을 방지하여 정보의 중복을 제거했습니다. 실제 값은 이미 별도의 텍스트 요소로 제공되고 있습니다.
:focus-visible: 테이블 컨테이너를 마우스로 클릭할 때마다 강한 포커스 링이 생기는 시각적 불편함을 해결하면서도 키보드 내비게이션 사용자를 위한 접근성은 그대로 유지했습니다.

📸 Before/After (스크린샷 / 플레이라이트 검증 완료)

HTML 구조 업데이트 & 포커스링 확인 완료: 플레이라이트를 통해 로컬에서 리포트 렌더링 후 탭 키를 시뮬레이트하여 :focus-visible 작동과 metric-card 레이아웃이 기존과 동일한 형태를 유지하는지 확인했습니다.

♿ Accessibility (접근성)

스크린 리더 지원 개선 (명시적인 키-값 시맨틱 태그 사용, 불필요한 노이즈 요소 숨김)
키보드 전용 사용자와 마우스 사용자 양쪽을 모두 고려한 초점 스타일 개선.

추가로 불필요한 python 패키지 import를 린트 지침에 맞게 일괄 정리했습니다.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 13617641418823156880 started by @seonghobae

- 주요-값 데이터를 표시할 때 시맨틱 `<dl>`, `<dt>`, `<dd>` 태그를 사용하도록 `_metric_section` 리팩토링. - 화면 판독기에서 불필요한 시각적 트랙을 숨기기 위해 `_bar_chart`의 `.bar-track` 요소에 `aria-hidden="true"` 추가. - 마우스 클릭 시 원치 않는 포커스 아웃라인을 방지하고 키보드 탐색 시에만 포커스가 나타나도록 CSS의 `.table-wrap:focus`를 `:focus-visible`로 변경. - `.jules/palette.md`에 관련된 UX/접근성 학습 기록 추가. - 사용되지 않는 import들을 제거하여 코드 품질 향상.

google-labs-jules · 2026-07-09T19:05:13Z

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

opencode-agent · 2026-07-10T10:01:00Z

OpenCode Review Overview

Head SHA: c2b7d591d03178ae643705f6ae56826af02badee
Workflow run: 29086009962
Workflow attempt: 1
Gate result: APPROVE (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .jules/palette.md, python/fast_mlsirm/report.py, scripts/build_benchmark_report.py, scripts/build_buyer_packet.py, scripts/build_procurement_due_diligence.py, and 6 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects .jules/palette.md to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.

Result: APPROVE
Reason: No blocking issues found; PR improves accessibility and UX with semantic HTML, ARIA, and keyboard focus handling.
Head SHA: c2b7d591d03178ae643705f6ae56826af02badee
Workflow run: 29086009962
Workflow attempt: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (6 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Test (5 files)"]
  S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test (5 files)"]
  R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]

opencode-agent

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .jules/palette.md, python/fast_mlsirm/report.py, scripts/build_benchmark_report.py, scripts/build_buyer_packet.py, scripts/build_procurement_due_diligence.py, and 6 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects .jules/palette.md to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.

Result: APPROVE
Reason: The PR introduces accessibility and UX enhancements to HTML reports, including semantic HTML tags, ARIA attributes, and improved keyboard focus handling. All tests pass, and coverage is adequate.
Head SHA: 4e70a851c4eacf97e60a9baa5ee029002f44bb64
Workflow run: 29043061286
Workflow attempt: 2

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (6 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Test (5 files)"]
  S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test (5 files)"]
  R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]

seonghobae · 2026-07-10T10:04:27Z

Current-head verification for this loop:

Head: 4e70a85
Action taken: reran the previously cancelled OpenCode Review run (29043061286); attempt 2 completed successfully and approved the PR.
Codegraph: codegraph init confirmed the repository was initialized; codegraph index re-indexed 54 files in this loop.
GitHub Checks on current HEAD: CI python/rust/package, CodeQL, Security Scan dependency-review/trivy-fs/osv-scan/scorecard, Strix, coverage-evidence, and OpenCode review all passed.
Security alerts checked: open code-scanning alerts = 0; open Dependabot alerts = 0.
Review surface checked: inline review comments = 0; review threads = 0; issue comments were reviewed and only contained Jules onboarding plus OpenCode approval.
Old-head queue checked: active old-head runs = 0.
No code changes were needed in this loop; the visible failure reason was a cancelled OpenCode run, now repaired by rerun.
Auto-merge requested after this verification. If merge is still held, the remaining blocker is repository/org native branch governance, not a build/security/test failure.

google-labs-jules · 2026-07-10T10:05:46Z

Current-head verification for this loop:

Head: 4e70a85

Action taken: reran the previously cancelled OpenCode Review run (29043061286); attempt 2 completed successfully and approved the PR.

Codegraph: codegraph init confirmed the repository was initialized; codegraph index re-indexed 54 files in this loop.

GitHub Checks on current HEAD: CI python/rust/package, CodeQL, Security Scan dependency-review/trivy-fs/osv-scan/scorecard, Strix, coverage-evidence, and OpenCode review all passed.

Security alerts checked: open code-scanning alerts = 0; open Dependabot alerts = 0.

Review surface checked: inline review comments = 0; review threads = 0; issue comments were reviewed and only contained Jules onboarding plus OpenCode approval.

Old-head queue checked: active old-head runs = 0.

No code changes were needed in this loop; the visible failure reason was a cancelled OpenCode run, now repaired by rerun.

Auto-merge requested after this verification. If merge is still held, the remaining blocker is repository/org native branch governance, not a build/security/test failure.

Acknowledged.

…-improvements-13617641418823156880

- 주요-값 데이터를 표시할 때 시맨틱 `<dl>`, `<dt>`, `<dd>` 태그를 사용하도록 `_metric_section` 리팩토링. - 화면 판독기에서 불필요한 시각적 트랙을 숨기기 위해 `_bar_chart`의 `.bar-track` 요소에 `aria-hidden="true"` 추가. - 마우스 클릭 시 원치 않는 포커스 아웃라인을 방지하고 키보드 탐색 시에만 포커스가 나타나도록 CSS의 `.table-wrap:focus`를 `:focus-visible`로 변경. - `.jules/palette.md`에 관련된 UX/접근성 학습 기록 추가. - 사용되지 않는 import들을 제거하여 코드 품질 향상.

…ts-13617641418823156880' into feat/ux-accessibility-improvements-13617641418823156880

opencode-agent

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .jules/palette.md, python/fast_mlsirm/report.py, scripts/build_benchmark_report.py, scripts/build_buyer_packet.py, scripts/build_procurement_due_diligence.py, and 6 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects .jules/palette.md to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.

Result: APPROVE
Reason: The PR introduces accessibility and UX enhancements to HTML reports, including semantic HTML tags, ARIA attributes, and improved keyboard focus handling. All tests pass, and coverage is adequate.
Head SHA: c3b19d4ccc36cc7701496212efd3c8bc6769f217
Workflow run: 29085430889
Workflow attempt: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (6 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Test (5 files)"]
  S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test (5 files)"]
  R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]

…-improvements-13617641418823156880

- 주요-값 데이터를 표시할 때 시맨틱 `<dl>`, `<dt>`, `<dd>` 태그를 사용하도록 `_metric_section` 리팩토링. - 화면 판독기에서 불필요한 시각적 트랙을 숨기기 위해 `_bar_chart`의 `.bar-track` 요소에 `aria-hidden="true"` 추가. - 마우스 클릭 시 원치 않는 포커스 아웃라인을 방지하고 키보드 탐색 시에만 포커스가 나타나도록 CSS의 `.table-wrap:focus`를 `:focus-visible`로 변경. - `.jules/palette.md`에 관련된 UX/접근성 학습 기록 추가. - 사용되지 않는 import들을 제거하여 코드 품질 향상.

    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4


-      - uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5


    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4


-      - uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5


        with:
          python-version: "3.12"
-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4be7066ada62dd38de10e7b70166bc74ed198c30
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable


    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4


-      - uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5


-      - run: python -m pip install --require-hashes -r requirements/package.txt
-      - run: python -m build --no-isolation
-      - run: python -m pip install --no-index --no-deps --force-reinstall dist/*.whl
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable


-      - run: python -m pip install --no-index --no-deps --force-reinstall dist/*.whl
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      - run: python -m pip install --upgrade pip build twine
+      - run: python -m build


seonghobae · 2026-07-10T11:49:06Z

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts on this branch.

- 주요-값 데이터를 표시할 때 시맨틱 `<dl>`, `<dt>`, `<dd>` 태그를 사용하도록 `_metric_section` 리팩토링. - 화면 판독기에서 불필요한 시각적 트랙을 숨기기 위해 `_bar_chart`의 `.bar-track` 요소에 `aria-hidden="true"` 추가. - 마우스 클릭 시 원치 않는 포커스 아웃라인을 방지하고 키보드 탐색 시에만 포커스가 나타나도록 CSS의 `.table-wrap:focus`를 `:focus-visible`로 변경. - `.jules/palette.md`에 관련된 UX/접근성 학습 기록 추가. - 사용되지 않는 import들을 제거하여 코드 품질 향상.

…115)

Copilot · 2026-07-10T11:56:57Z

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts on this branch.

Resolved. I rebased this branch onto the latest remote state and fixed all merge/rebase conflicts; the branch is now conflict-free at a8c077f.

opencode-agent Bot previously approved these changes Jul 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

seonghobae and others added 4 commits July 10, 2026 19:05

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/ux-accessibility…

a8132a7

…-improvements-13617641418823156880

Normalize Jules palette path

bc8186b

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feat/ux-accessibility-improvemen…

c3b19d4

…ts-13617641418823156880' into feat/ux-accessibility-improvements-13617641418823156880

seonghobae dismissed opencode-agent[bot]’s stale review via c3b19d4 July 10, 2026 10:09

opencode-agent Bot previously approved these changes Jul 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

seonghobae and others added 2 commits July 10, 2026 19:19

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/ux-accessibility…

c2b7d59

…-improvements-13617641418823156880

seonghobae dismissed opencode-agent[bot]’s stale review via 422a7a9 July 10, 2026 10:32

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Jul 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started work on behalf of seonghobae July 10, 2026 11:49 View session

seonghobae and others added 12 commits July 10, 2026 11:54

security: keep PR report links on safe schemes

bc08664

chore(deps): bump google/clusterfuzzlite/actions/build_fuzzers (#134)

1a1072a

🎨 Palette: 테이블 컨테이너에 대한 키보드 탐색 및 마우스 클릭 UX 개선 (#133)

9b3f07d

⚡ Bolt: 유클리디안 거리 연산 성능 개선 (#132)

6014cfb

Bump github/codeql-action/analyze (#128)

fb360dc

Bump github/codeql-action/init (#127)

97c187b

feat(estimator): MMLE-EM estimator axis robust to missing data (#98)

197027c

🎨 Palette: 리포트 메트릭 카드의 HTML 접근성 향상 및 포커스 스타일 개선 (#105)

6b506c1

test: pin MLS2PLM neg-loglik and gradient to canonical equation (#114)

a3a228e

perf: make Rust core the primary numeric path with 1e-6 parity gate (#…

c0ef2c7

…115)

ci: declare read-only workflow permissions (#118)

a8c077f

Copilot finished work on behalf of seonghobae July 10, 2026 11:57

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

🎨 Palette: HTML 리포트 접근성 및 UX 개선#125

🎨 Palette: HTML 리포트 접근성 및 UX 개선#125
seonghobae wants to merge 19 commits into
mainfrom
feat/ux-accessibility-improvements-13617641418823156880

seonghobae commented Jul 9, 2026

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Uh oh!

opencode-agent Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

seonghobae commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

seonghobae commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

seonghobae commented Jul 9, 2026

💡 What (무엇을)

🎯 Why (왜)

📸 Before/After (스크린샷 / 플레이라이트 검증 완료)

♿ Accessibility (접근성)

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Uh oh!

opencode-agent Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 • edited by github-actions Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

OpenCode Review Overview

Pull request overview

Findings

Summary

Changed-File Evidence Map

Uh oh!

opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Findings

Summary

Changed-File Evidence Map

Uh oh!

seonghobae commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Findings

Summary

Changed-File Evidence Map

Uh oh!

seonghobae commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

opencode-agent Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading