Added release notes for V1.0.0 - #346
Merged
Merged
Conversation
casparvl
marked this pull request as draft
July 10, 2026 16:22
laraPPr
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2026
laraPPr
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm good with making it a 1.0.0. Since all tests are now using the EESSI mixin class and we a lot of enhancements.
Collaborator
|
I'm back and I would like a new release so pinging @satishskamath and @smoors |
Collaborator
|
I had a small concern about core ReFrame and the mixin class performance but that is a topic for further development. As it is now, I am good with making this a 1.0.0 release. |
satishskamath
self-requested a review
July 28, 2026 15:14
satishskamath
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2026
casparvl
commented
Jul 29, 2026
casparvl
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 29, 2026 07:16
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To be discussed: shall we indeed name this v1.0.0? :)
Put in draft, because I'd like to have confirmation from all of @laraPPr @satishskamath and @smoors before we approve this. I.e. I don't want a single person to merge this too early :)