docs: EXPOSED-991 Specify the lack of R2DBC support in DAO-related topics#2749
Merged
docs: EXPOSED-991 Specify the lack of R2DBC support in DAO-related topics#2749
Conversation
bog-walk
reviewed
Mar 6, 2026
bog-walk
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
Member
bog-walk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👋 Left a comment about "Table Types"
Also, could you edit the PR title? It almost sounds like we are documenting that R2DBC support is now there for DAO. Let's please make it clear for changelog that it is still absent.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
<tldr>section in DAO-related topics with required dependency and JDBC/R2DBC support.<br>element in Adding dependencies.Type of Change
Related Issues
EXPOSED-991