Skip to content

docs: EXPOSED-991 Specify the lack of R2DBC support in DAO-related topics#2749

Merged
vnikolova merged 2 commits intomainfrom
vnikolova/EXPOSED-991
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

docs: EXPOSED-991 Specify the lack of R2DBC support in DAO-related topics#2749
vnikolova merged 2 commits intomainfrom
vnikolova/EXPOSED-991

Conversation

@vnikolova
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

  • Add a <tldr> section in DAO-related topics with required dependency and JDBC/R2DBC support.
  • Fix outdated package name in DAO Table types.
  • Fix<br> element in Adding dependencies.

Type of Change

  • Documentation update

Related Issues

EXPOSED-991

@vnikolova vnikolova requested a review from bog-walk March 3, 2026 11:00
Copy link
Member

@bog-walk bog-walk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 Left a comment about "Table Types"

Also, could you edit the PR title? It almost sounds like we are documenting that R2DBC support is now there for DAO. Let's please make it clear for changelog that it is still absent.

@vnikolova vnikolova changed the title docs: EXPOSED-991 Document R2DBC support in DAO-related topics docs: EXPOSED-991 Specify the lack of R2DBC support in DAO-related topics Mar 6, 2026
@vnikolova vnikolova merged commit 7159e97 into main Mar 6, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@vnikolova vnikolova deleted the vnikolova/EXPOSED-991 branch March 6, 2026 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants