Hello, and thank you for Leaves.
I maintain Cobble, a free, open-source Minecraft launcher and server manager.
When someone creates a server with it, they pick the server software from a list,
and each entry shows a small mark so it can be told apart at a glance.
I have read LICENCE-LOGO in LeavesMC/Website:
LeavesMC logos or images licensed with us are subject to the following license:
Copyright © 2024 LeavesMC. All rights reserved.
So assets/brand/leaves.svg is not bundled with Cobble, and will not be.
What Cobble does show beside the name "Leaves" is
leaf-fill.svg from Phosphor Icons,
which is MIT-licensed. I would rather be transparent about why I believe that
file, and not yours, is the one I am entitled to use: assets/brand/leaves.svg
appears to be that same Phosphor glyph re-exported — the same viewBox
(0 0 256 256), the same anchor points rounded to one decimal place
(223.45,40.07 → 224,39.5), the same stem cut-out, the same detached stalk.
If I have that wrong, please tell me and I will correct both the file and the
documentation.
Two things I would like to ask:
- Would you rather no leaf mark were shown against Leaves at all? If so I
will remove it in the next release — no discussion needed, no reason required.
- Or would you be willing to permit your own file to be used? Unmodified, at
its published size, purely to identify Leaves as the software a server runs on.
If yes, I would rather ship yours than a stand-in.
Either answer is fine. Thank you either way, and thank you for the work on Leaves.
Hello, and thank you for Leaves.
I maintain Cobble, a free, open-source Minecraft launcher and server manager.
When someone creates a server with it, they pick the server software from a list,
and each entry shows a small mark so it can be told apart at a glance.
I have read
LICENCE-LOGOinLeavesMC/Website:So
assets/brand/leaves.svgis not bundled with Cobble, and will not be.What Cobble does show beside the name "Leaves" is
leaf-fill.svgfrom Phosphor Icons,which is MIT-licensed. I would rather be transparent about why I believe that
file, and not yours, is the one I am entitled to use:
assets/brand/leaves.svgappears to be that same Phosphor glyph re-exported — the same
viewBox(
0 0 256 256), the same anchor points rounded to one decimal place(
223.45,40.07→224,39.5), the same stem cut-out, the same detached stalk.If I have that wrong, please tell me and I will correct both the file and the
documentation.
Two things I would like to ask:
will remove it in the next release — no discussion needed, no reason required.
its published size, purely to identify Leaves as the software a server runs on.
If yes, I would rather ship yours than a stand-in.
Either answer is fine. Thank you either way, and thank you for the work on Leaves.