Skip to content

Populate gen_specs from generator - #1594

Closed
shuds13 wants to merge 1 commit into
experimental/jlnav_plus_shuds_asktellfrom
experimental/merging_gen_specs
Closed

Populate gen_specs from generator#1594
shuds13 wants to merge 1 commit into
experimental/jlnav_plus_shuds_asktellfrom
experimental/merging_gen_specs

Conversation

@shuds13

@shuds13 shuds13 commented Sep 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is experimenting.

Do not pull this one in, I will create a new PR after update_finalize is merged as this is different subject.


Optimas nlopt getting errors.

sim_ended prep_fields hack not needed in libE test - not sure with Optimas.

Is population of gen_specs from generator needed with Optimas or external gens

Should not be as worked before but this has a trial method to get it from ExternalGenerator.

Update: With further thought, I may abandon this. The internal gen_specs is for the internal generator in case of using a proxy gen (ie. it is for the APOSMM running on a process) - which receives converted values (x, f or fvec). Whereas the external gen_specs in libE should really be determined by vocs entries. So they probably end up being the same. But in Optimas, for example, they are set by vocs and you dont want, say x or fvec, getting added (when it should be using beam_length or a series of vals).

Setting from VOCS, as the gen has been given vocs, in theory can get from gen - and Optimas is doing this (trials are set from generator get_gen_specs) - but would need to have stored original inputs.

Superceded by #1620 (which sets from vocs).

Optimas nlopt getting errors.

sim_ended prep_fields hack not needed in libE test - not sure with Optimas.

Is population of gen_specs from generator needed with Optimas or external gens

Should not be as worked before but this has a trial method to get it from ExternalGenerator.
@shuds13 shuds13 self-assigned this Sep 20, 2025
Base automatically changed from feature/update_finalize to experimental/jlnav_plus_shuds_asktell October 2, 2025 18:27
@shuds13 shuds13 closed this Nov 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant