ci(review): enroll capacitor in fleet PR review panel

[Coldaine]

User description

Install uniform 15-line fleet caller workflow for autonomous PR review.

---

CodeAnt-AI Description

Enroll pull requests in the automated review workflow

What Changed

• Pull requests now receive automated reviews when opened, marked ready, reopened, updated, or labeled
• The review workflow can post results and updates directly to the pull request

Impact

✅ Automated PR reviews
✅ Review coverage on pull request updates
✅ Review results posted to pull requests

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

[codeant-ai]

🤖 CodeAnt AI — Review Status

Status	Commit	Started (UTC)	Finished (UTC)
✅ Reviewed your PR	88eb142	Sep 04, 2026 · 23:26	23:28

[codeant-ai]

---

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-04T23:28:27.447469Z	88eb142	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[codeant-ai]

Suggestion: The reusable workflow follows mutable main, so later upstream changes can silently alter this repository's review behavior and execution security. [security]

Assessment: 🔴 Critical · 🔁 Occurrence: Sometimes

Prompt for AI Agent 🤖

This is a comment left during a code review.

**Path:** .github/workflows/pr-review.yml
**Line:** 14:14
**Comment:**
	*Security: The reusable workflow follows mutable `main`, so later upstream changes can silently alter this repository's review behavior and execution security.

Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix

👍 | 👎

[kilo-code-bot]

SUGGESTION: Inconsistent actions/checkout version across jobs

The build-and-test job was downgraded from actions/checkout@v7 to actions/checkout@v4, but lint-linear-ids (line 121) and aot-check (line 139) still use @v7. The downgrade is unrelated to the runner.temp fix and lacks explanation. Either keep v7 consistently or downgrade all three jobs.

---

Reply with @kilocode-bot fix it to have Kilo Code address this issue.

[kilo-code-bot]

Code Review Summary

Status: 1 Issue Found | Recommendation: Clarify before merge

Overview

Severity	Count
SUGGESTION	1

Issue Details (click to expand)

Files Reviewed (2 files)

• .github/workflows/pr-review.yml - Existing CodeAnt finding on line 14 (@main mutable reference) is not duplicated. The "Do not edit here" comment on line 2 indicates this is intentional fleet-control-plane design.
• .github/workflows/ci.yml - The ${{ runner.temp }} to $RUNNER_TEMP fix is correct. However, the workflow-level env block (which set DOTNET_CLI_HOME, NUGET_PACKAGES, npm_config_cache for all jobs) was removed and only replaced with a $RUNNER_TEMP step in build-and-test. The aot-check job (which runs dotnet restore/dotnet publish) no longer receives NUGET_PACKAGES, contrary to the removed comment's intent to keep package state in the temp dir.

Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud

---

_{Reviewed by laguna-s-2.1:free · Input: 105.9K · Output: 24.7K · Cached: 80.8K}