New scan workflow + sonar project config file to enable sonarqube scans#1832
Open
dandelany wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
New scan workflow + sonar project config file to enable sonarqube scans#1832dandelany wants to merge 1 commit into
dandelany wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool. What Enabling Code Scanning Means:
For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per MGSS/AMMOS requirements, we need to use a combination of CodeQL + SonarQube for security scans moving forward, via GH actions. This will ultimately be implemented in all PlanDev repos & will replace the existing CodeQL scans.
This is affected by this
nasa-scrubissue and contains a temporary workaround to avoid it, which we can easily remove later when fixed upstream.JPL internal docs with details: https://wiki.jpl.nasa.gov/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=AmmosArch&title=Code+Vulnerability+Scanning+Set+Up+for+AMMOS+Open+Source+Software
See also: NASA-AMMOS/plandev-ui#1935