Skip to content

Conversation

@timmoon10
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Update list of authorized CI users.

Type of change

  • Documentation change (change only to the documentation, either a fix or a new content)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Infra/Build change
  • Code refactoring

Changes

  • Update list of authorized CI users

Checklist:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • The functionality is complete
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Signed-off-by: Tim Moon <[email protected]>
@timmoon10 timmoon10 requested a review from ptrendx January 9, 2026 01:55
@timmoon10 timmoon10 added the testing Improvements to tests or testing infrastructure label Jan 9, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

This PR updates the authorized CI users list in the GitHub Actions workflow that triggers CI builds on the hybrid infrastructure. The change removes janekb04 from the authorized users and adds kainzhong in their place.

What Changed:

  • Removed: janekb04 from line 59
  • Added: kainzhong on line 60 (after shengfangd)

Context:
This workflow (trigger-ci.yml) is security-critical as it:

  • Runs on self-hosted runners (blossom)
  • Is triggered by issue comments starting with /te-ci
  • Has access to sensitive secrets (GITHUB_TOKEN, BLOSSOM_KEY, CI_SERVER)
  • Controls who can trigger CI builds on the infrastructure

Verification:

  • YAML syntax and structure are correct
  • The logical condition is properly maintained (proper use of && and || operators)
  • Indentation is consistent with existing entries
  • No duplicate users exist in the list
  • The closing parenthesis is present
  • The total count remains at 40 authorized users

Assessment:
This is a straightforward administrative change to update team membership. The implementation is clean and maintains the existing pattern. No other files require updates as this is the only location where these usernames are referenced.

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with no risk of breaking functionality
  • This is a simple administrative change that updates the list of authorized CI users. The YAML syntax is correct, the logical structure is maintained, indentation is consistent, and no duplicate users exist. The change follows the established pattern and only affects access control without modifying any workflow logic or behavior.
  • No files require special attention

Important Files Changed

File Analysis

Filename Score Overview
.github/workflows/trigger-ci.yml 5/5 Updated authorized CI users list by removing janekb04 and adding kainzhong. Syntax and structure are correct.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as Authorized User
    participant GitHub as GitHub Platform
    participant Auth as Authorization Job
    participant Vuln as Vulnerability Scan
    participant Trigger as CI Job Trigger
    
    User->>GitHub: Comment "/te-ci" on PR
    GitHub->>Auth: Trigger issue_comment event
    
    alt User in authorized list (kainzhong added, janekb04 removed)
        Auth->>Auth: Verify user authorization
        Auth->>Vuln: Continue workflow
        
        Vuln->>GitHub: Checkout repository
        Vuln->>Vuln: Run security scan
        Vuln->>Trigger: Proceed to CI
        
        Trigger->>Trigger: Execute CI build
        Trigger->>GitHub: Post results
    else User not authorized
        Auth->>Auth: Stop workflow
    end
Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

testing Improvements to tests or testing infrastructure

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant