Skip to content

Performance when using fisheye images / recommendations for distortion? #62

Description

@duanshuangda

Hi team,

First of all, thank you for releasing Fast-Foundation-Stereo!

I am currently testing the model's performance on stereo images captured by fisheye cameras. In my preliminary tests, I noticed that the inference results (disparity/depth estimation) are quite poor compared to standard pinhole camera images.

I would love to know:

Has the model been trained or tested on fisheye/highly-distorted images before?

Do you have any recommended preprocessing steps or configurations to improve performance in this scenario?

What I have tried / observed:

Standard rectification doesn't seem to fully resolve the massive radial distortion on the edges, leading to severe artifacts in the depth map.

The model seems to struggle significantly with the non-linear pixel displacement inherent to fisheye lenses.

Any insights, advice, or recommended pipelines (e.g., undistorting to pinhole models first vs. adapting the intrinsic parameters) would be greatly appreciated!

Image [K.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29406214/K.txt) Image Image Image

mower_3_calibration.yaml

Image Image

Thanks in advance!

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions