build CEQR schools 2026

[damonmcc]

related to #2082

hopefully we modernize how we handle these datasets before we need to build them next year (definitely said the same thing last year)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.68%. Comparing base (ab686f5) to head (5b05058).

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
dcpy/library/archive.py	83.33% <ø> (ø)
dcpy/library/cli.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
dcpy/library/ingest.py	87.80% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[damonmcc]

so I don't have to run a dev container to run builds that use geosupport, modeled on the in-use ceqr_dep_monthly.yml action. couldn't test this with workflow_dispatch untill it's merged

[damonmcc]

pretty sure the LCGMS we get form CAPS for CEQR schools is different that what we get from the DOE website and use in the doe_lcgms ingest template. need to use library to archive this to the recipe postgres DB anyway so it wasn't worth resolving to a single ingest template to build the CEQR schools datasets

[fvankrieken]

Can we give this a different id then? Feels unlikely that it would happen by accident, but we still shouldn't have two different ingest/library templates with the same dataset id.

[fvankrieken]

bumping this comment - other than that, good to go