[Eoic]

Issue and requirements

Closes #84. Maintainer-reported branding defect with no dedicated requirement ID.

Summary

Android and iOS stretched the tall Papyrus emblem into a square. Regenerate the client icons from the canonical SVG with proportional scaling and platform padding. Add Android adaptive icons, safe web maskable icons, and Papyrus replacements for the macOS and Windows Flutter templates.

Add an icon generator and CI validation for artwork, dimensions, opacity, catalog/manifest sizes, and masking safe zones. Maintenance instructions live in the generator's --help.

Testing

Passed locally:

• uv run tools/generate_icons.py --check: 38 PNGs and 10 Windows ICO resolutions.
• Repeated generation produced identical bytes. Validation rejected stretched artwork, wrong dimensions, and unexpected alpha.
• tools/papyrus check client: formatting, analysis, and four web bootstrap tests.
• tools/papyrus test client -- test/widgets/auth/auth_page_layouts_test.dart test/widgets/shell/desktop_sidebar_test.dart: 11 tests.
• Android debug APK compilation and inspection of the packaged adaptive-icon XML.
• iOS and macOS asset-catalog compilation with actool.
• git diff --check.

UI evidence

Android legacy bitmap comparison. These are exported assets, not device screenshots.

Before	After

Also inspected generated circle, squircle, and rounded-square adaptive previews without clipping.

Compatibility and migration

No migrations or version changes. Android 26+ uses adaptive layers. Legacy bitmap icons remain available.

Notes

Samsung launcher acceptance remains pending because no Android device was connected. Windows/Linux runtime appearance was not tested. The Android build passed with an SDK XML-version warning.

Checklist

• The branch, commits, and pull request title follow the repository conventions.
• The change is complete and limited to the agreed scope.
• Relevant tests have been added or updated.
• Formatting, analysis, and tests pass locally.
• Documentation, UI evidence, and migration notes are included where relevant.
• No credentials, personal data, copyrighted fixtures, or unrelated generated files are included.
• The branch is up to date with its target branch.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-24T13:20:09.043053Z	52fb7ba	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!