Skip to content

Conversation

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao commented Dec 10, 2025

No need for QA, just merge when approved

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements

    • Added informational alert to Google Calendar upcoming event alerts explaining API key requirements and available polling alternatives.
  • Chores

    • Updated component versions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs Ignored Ignored Dec 10, 2025 6:15pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit Ignored Ignored Dec 10, 2025 6:15pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Walkthrough

Version bumps applied to the Google Calendar component package and upcoming-event-alert source. A new informational alert property has been added to the upcoming-event-alert source configuration to inform users about API key requirements and alternative polling-based source options.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Package version update
components/google_calendar/package.json
Incremented package version from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1
Source component updates
components/google_calendar/sources/upcoming-event-alert/upcoming-event-alert.mjs
Bumped source version from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 and added a new public pollingInfo alert-type prop providing informational content about Pipedream API key requirements and alternative polling source option

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description lacks the required 'WHY' section from the template and provides only a dismissive statement instead of explaining the purpose or rationale for the changes. Provide a detailed 'WHY' section explaining the motivation, benefits, and rationale for adding the pollingInfo alert prop to the upcoming-event-alert source.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding an info prop to the upcoming-event-alert source component, which aligns with the summary showing a new pollingInfo prop added.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch google-calendar-info-prop

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd65b8e and 45646f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/google_calendar/package.json (1 hunks)
  • components/google_calendar/sources/upcoming-event-alert/upcoming-event-alert.mjs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/google_calendar/package.json (1)

3-3: Package version bump aligns with scoped change

Patch version bump from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1 is appropriate for adding a non-breaking informational prop to a single source; nothing else in the manifest needs adjustment.

components/google_calendar/sources/upcoming-event-alert/upcoming-event-alert.mjs (1)

9-19: Alert prop addition and version bump look correct

  • Bumping the source version to 0.1.1 matches the non-breaking UI/config addition.
  • The new pollingInfo alert prop is well-structured and clearly explains the API key requirement and polling alternative, without impacting runtime behavior.

No changes requested.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @GTFalcao, LGTM! Ready for QA!

@luancazarine luancazarine moved this from Ready for PR Review to Ready for QA in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 11, 2025
@vunguyenhung
Copy link
Collaborator

@vunguyenhung vunguyenhung moved this from Ready for QA to Ready for Release in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 12, 2025
@vunguyenhung
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release!

Test reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Ready for Release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants