fix(approval): mark registry-sourced asset labels as unverified - #126
fix(approval): mark registry-sourced asset labels as unverified#126dmnyc wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
@claude review |
|
Claude finished @dmnyc's task in 3m 7s —— View job Review: registry label badge on token-send approvalsGood, minimal change that lands the L-13 recommendation, and the inline comment explains why the row exists rather than what it does — consistent with the rest of this file. No XSS surface (React escapes; the Jade path already 1. The provenance marker is the part that gets truncated 🔴
value={`${sendReview.assetTicker} · registry`}Inside a
Suggested shape: value={`registry · ${sendReview.assetTicker.slice(0, 24)}`} "${sendReview.assetTicker}" comes from the public asset registry and is not verified — identify the asset by its ID above.`}Leading with 2. On the in-wallet Send path,
|
…pable 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
|
Review response — fd7c6a1:
Typecheck + 327 tests pass locally. |
Fixes #113 (L-13).
Token-send approvals showed the registry ticker (and amount scaled by registry precision) with no signal that both come from the public asset registry — data an issued asset can steer. A
Label: <ticker> · registryrow now sits under the asset ID row, with the hover title spelling out that the name is unverified and the ID is the identifier. Exact base units were already shown in their own row, so a wrong precision can't hide the true amount.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.