Tag published version and run check-types if declared.

[pkaminski]

This will also require switching to write permissions in all callers; I'll commit those changes directly.

---

This change is 

[snoack]

@snoack reviewed 1 file and all commit messages, and made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on pkaminski).

---

.github/workflows/publish.yaml line 184 at r1 (raw file):

          const name = pkg.name;
          const version = pkg.version;
          fs.appendFileSync(process.env.GITHUB_OUTPUT, `package_name=${name}\n`);

Does the package name even matter? In practice it's just the name of the repo, and therefore redundant in the commit message, or am I missing something?

[pkaminski]

@pkaminski made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on snoack).

---

.github/workflows/publish.yaml line 184 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, snoack (Sebastian Noack) wrote…

Does the package name even matter? In practice it's just the name of the repo, and therefore redundant in the commit message, or am I missing something?

Doesn't terribly matter, but Codex decided to give the tags' messages the full name@version treatment (see next to last line), and given that it's just a couple extra lines here I find it hard to get upset about it.