Skip to content

Conversation

@BartLucien
Copy link
Contributor

@BartLucien BartLucien commented Dec 12, 2025

The link to the ticket.
The link to the corresponding PR.

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@BartLucien BartLucien marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2025 08:19
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link
Contributor

@GabrielFleischer GabrielFleischer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants