You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Blog post about 1000 distinct committers / history of the project #21305
One interesting usecase that @gene-bordegaray and I were taliing about recently was that DataFusion's structure allows replacing legacy processing systems incrementally (e.g. from the bottom of their plans up) -- with a full on systems like Trino they would likely need to do it all at once, which would be much riskier. I think DataDog falls into this category given their public presentations. I know of other systems that do but I am not sure how much is public
This is awesome 🚀 @alamb brought up the incremental adoption feature / use case and think that it would be great to highlight in the post. I presume this will be even more valuable in the future as systems are seeing rapid changes to their requirements. I think more discussion in the community about how this is being used / where they see it going would be great 👍
I am wondering how this GitHub contributor list is composed for an Apache-structured project. I don't see my commits there. Does it only include committers/maintainers who are committing and merging PRs?
I am wondering how this GitHub contributor list is composed for an Apache-structured project. I don't see my commits there. Does it only include committers/maintainers who are committing and merging PRs?
@theirix I think that list only shows the top 100 per number of contributions. Using the GitHub API shows all, including you:
I am wondering how this GitHub contributor list is composed for an Apache-structured project. I don't see my commits there. Does it only include committers/maintainers who are committing and merging PRs?
@theirix I think that list only shows the top 100 per number of contributions. Using the GitHub API shows all, including you:
{
"login": "theirix",
...
"contributions": 15
},
It works quite strangely, since the "Last 24 months" view shows only 72 contributors, with 1 to 1315 commits. So I believe the project has even more contributors, given that GitHub statistics are flaky.
Activity
gene-bordegaray commentedon Apr 1, 2026
This is awesome 🚀
@alamb brought up the incremental adoption feature / use case and think that it would be great to highlight in the post. I presume this will be even more valuable in the future as systems are seeing rapid changes to their requirements. I think more discussion in the community about how this is being used / where they see it going would be great 👍
theirix commentedon Apr 1, 2026
I am wondering how this GitHub contributor list is composed for an Apache-structured project. I don't see my commits there. Does it only include committers/maintainers who are committing and merging PRs?
nuno-faria commentedon Apr 1, 2026
@theirix I think that list only shows the top 100 per number of contributions. Using the GitHub API shows all, including you:
{ "login": "theirix", ... "contributions": 15 },theirix commentedon Apr 1, 2026
It works quite strangely, since the "Last 24 months" view shows only 72 contributors, with 1 to 1315 commits. So I believe the project has even more contributors, given that GitHub statistics are flaky.
alamb commentedon Apr 7, 2026
I suggest using
gitdirectly to count contributors if we want to pubish numbersAdez017 commentedon Apr 24, 2026
Hi @alamb , would love to draft a blog for this one . perhaps need some clarifications .
alamb commentedon Apr 27, 2026
Sounds great @Adez017 !
Adez017 commentedon Apr 27, 2026
take
Adez017 commentedon Apr 28, 2026
@alamb , what should we primarily focus on ?
is it history or impact or how datafusion is been outperforming . let me know your vision /thoughts.