Skip to content

[hotfix] [pyflink] Fix Python Datastream JDBC Java method reference#27528

Open
bandersen23 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
bandersen23:hotfix-jdbc-datastream-python-connector
Open

[hotfix] [pyflink] Fix Python Datastream JDBC Java method reference#27528
bandersen23 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
bandersen23:hotfix-jdbc-datastream-python-connector

Conversation

@bandersen23
Copy link

What is the purpose of the change

This is a hot fix that affects any version of the Python API with a desire to use flink-connector-jdbc versions 3.2 and above. The method called in the Python API moved locations within the connector and so the wrong method is being called. This change would break anyone using a version of flink connector below 3.2.

Brief change log

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): yes - update path required
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable

@bandersen23 bandersen23 marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2026 20:54
@bandersen23
Copy link
Author

If we could also merge this into the current LTS version that would be awesome!

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Feb 4, 2026

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants