We noted that the GC% reported by SKA can be quote different from that reported by seqkit stats on the same FASTQ files.
I am wondering if maybe SKA is only counting each unique split k-mer once, rather than every instance of it in the raw data?
Or is there another explaination?
We noted that the GC% reported by SKA can be quote different from that reported by
seqkit statson the same FASTQ files.I am wondering if maybe SKA is only counting each unique split k-mer once, rather than every instance of it in the raw data?
Or is there another explaination?