Add lightfuzz SSRF submodule, fix interactsh issues

[liquidsec]

• Fixes interactsh issues, such as those reported in Interactsh Errors #1053, and others
• New SSRF lightfuzz submodule
• Generalized the interactsh callback so any lightfuzz submodule (not just cmdi) can store its own name/description/severity/confidence in the subdomain tag dict
• Protocol-aware findings: DNS-only interactions → HIGH/MODERATE, HTTP interactions → HIGH/CONFIRMED
• Added debug logging to interactsh poll loop and lightfuzz finish() poll

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing 3.0 (baseline) vs lightfuzz-ssrf-and-interactsh-fix (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	4.27ms	4.29ms	+0.5% ⚪	✅
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	17.56ms	17.84ms	+1.6% ⚪	✅
Large Closest Match Lookup	362.42ms	349.87ms	-3.5% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	195.67ms	192.66ms	-1.5% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	502.21ms	490.80ms	-2.3% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	777.86ms	758.47ms	-2.5% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	31.83ms	30.85ms	-3.1% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	317.78ms	317.99ms	+0.1% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	13.90ms	14.10ms	+1.4% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	4.092s	4.110s	+0.4% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.749s	9.815s	+0.7% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	4.245s	4.283s	+0.9% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	7.357s	7.376s	+0.3% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	3.21ms	3.23ms	+0.6% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	11.53ms	11.50ms	-0.3% ⚪	✅
Mixed Ip Operations	4.59ms	4.54ms	-1.1% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	61.30µs	60.95µs	-0.6% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	700.75µs	691.59µs	-1.3% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

✅ No significant performance changes detected (all changes <10%)

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.14

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 84.53608% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92%. Comparing base (389b8aa) to head (34d5895).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on 3.0.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
bbot/core/helpers/interactsh.py	56%	11 Missing ⚠️
bbot/modules/lightfuzz/lightfuzz.py	79%	3 Missing ⚠️
bbot/modules/lightfuzz/submodules/ssrf.py	94%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             3.0   #2950   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     92%     92%   -0%     
=====================================
  Files        436     437    +1     
  Lines      35642   35735   +93     
=====================================
+ Hits       32504   32580   +76     
- Misses      3138    3155   +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.