LLM benchmark: new evals + improved tooling#5583
Open
bradleyshep wants to merge 76 commits into
Open
Conversation
…to bradley/new-llm-benchmark-evals-0717 # Conflicts: # tools/xtask-llm-benchmark/src/bench/publishers.rs # tools/xtask-llm-benchmark/src/bench/runner.rs # tools/xtask-llm-benchmark/src/bin/llm_benchmark.rs
# Conflicts: # skills/typescript-server/SKILL.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Changes
Adds 37 LLM benchmark evals (
t_047–t_083) covering SpacetimeDB functionality across:Each eval includes consistent prompts, language-specific goldens, schema validation, and behavioral scoring for TypeScript, Rust, and C#.
This PR also improves the benchmark runner by isolating concurrent builds and databases, enforcing timeouts, handling transient build failures more reliably, and running work in parallel. The periodic workflow now runs each language in a separate job.
The server skills were updated with general, non-prescriptive guidance for the functionality covered by these evals.
API and ABI breaking changes
None.
Expected complexity level and risk
Complexity: 2/5.
This is a secondary testing tool and is isolated from the product. These changes do not affect SpacetimeDB runtime behavior or public APIs. The main risk is incorrect eval scoring or benchmark workflow failures.
Testing