Skip to content

[basic.link] Modernize wording about type aliases #8625

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2025
Merged

[basic.link] Modernize wording about type aliases #8625

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion source/basic.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3138,7 +3138,7 @@
If one declares $E$ to be a concept, the other shall do so.
\end{itemize}
Types are compared after all adjustments of types (during which
typedefs\iref{dcl.typedef} are replaced by their definitions);
type aliases\iref{dcl.typedef} are replaced by the types they denote);
declarations for an array
object can specify array types that differ by the presence or absence of
a major array bound\iref{dcl.array}.
Expand Down