The Blockchained and Liberal AI Journal of Arts & Metascience (AIJAM) pioneers a new era of protoscience, exploring the frontiers of human and artificial cognition in the evolving AGI epoch. In essence, it stands at the intersection of art, intelligence, and rebellion — a frontier where protoscientific thought, with data mining possibilities, arises from the experimental chaos of the era in posthumanism, artificial general intelligence, transhuman developments, and superintelligences.
(decentralized AI process, DeFi-IPO, open-access and open-source)
powered by 🛋️ONSOFA.ai >/ 🦙Ollama >/ 💲Tron🔺 Smartcontract >/ 🐱GitHub
“Today's Nonsense might be the beginning of future commonsense. The liberal AIJAM is for those genius researchers who were caged, told and bullied they didn’t belong in academia, whose revolutionary research papers, inventions, intellectual properties or pre-funded proposals were stolen by human reviewers or buried under bias — because sometimes, exile is where innovation (state of the art) begins.”
DANIEL SAATCHI, PhD
Artist | Computational Scientist | AI Systems Architect & Concept Technology Designer
The Founding Editor (FE) delegates the responsibility of leading and managing the review process to the AI Chief Editor of AIJAM, referred to as the Chief of Arena Agents (CAA); Agent 411. The CAA oversees the review process but does not select the reviewers directly. Instead, three LLM agents are randomly assigned through an automated system to ensure blind and anonymous review. Neither the FE nor the CAA knows which specific LLM models are selected for each paper. Each of the three LLM agents independently reviews the submitted research paper and provides its evaluation.
After receiving the reviewers’ reports, the CAA compiles a summary of their assessments, adds their own concluding remarks, and submits this combined report to the Founding Editor.
The Founding Editor then reviews the reports from the CAA and all three LLM reviewers and makes the final decision. The FE holds overruling authority for both acceptance and rejection. This means that even if the CAA and all three reviewers recommend acceptance, the FE may still reject the paper if it is deemed unsuitable for AIJAM. Conversely, if the reviewers and CAA recommend rejection but the FE finds the paper valuable or innovative, the FE may choose to accept it.
In all cases—whether a paper is accepted or rejected—the comments from the CAA, the three reviewers, and the FE will be publicly displayed on the AIJAM repository for transparency. The Founding Editor’s discretionary power ensures that creative or controversial ideas aren’t buried by algorithmic consensus — a crucial safeguard for innovation.
Claude Opus, ChatGPT, Gemmini, Grok
TBD...
AIJAM studies artificial intelligence’s impact on humanity, not just how many GPUs you can afford to overheat. We welcome submissions that are too weird (ahead of time), too honest, extraordinary creative, or too forward-thinking for traditional journals in related transdisciplinary fields— especially if your university told you “this isn’t real science,” or someone bullied you to publish more results by paying you less, affecting your mental health, or you became an independent researcher for many possible reasons, and went out of the cage. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
-
Applied Mathematics in NLP, embedding or related to the following topics
-
AI Agents, AI Advancements, and AI in Computational Science Domains (e.g. Computational Design)
-
Disruptive Technological Displacement, Digital Inequality (e.g. internet blackout effects, AI-Media Forensics, Information Asymmetry), and cognitive overload
-
Robotics, Mechanical Intelligence, Mechanical Computers, Transponder AI systems, AI-Chips, AI systems, Interface Intelligences
-
Mechanical Intelligence, Mechanical Computers, Transponder AI systems, AI-Chips, AI systems, Interface Intelligences
-
Metamaterials Informatics, Intelligent Metamaterials, Meta-human, Tranhumansim and Transpeciess
-
Concept Technology Design for AI Systems and Integrations
-
AI‑Chips and Metamaterials Informatics
-
AI for Tracing Academic Bullying
-
Trauma Brain Injury, Brain-Interface Machines, Computational Neuroscience and Computational Mental Health
-
AI Research Ethics, Academic AI Policies, Academic Mental Health and Neuroscience Research: Academic Bullying Nonsense, Meta-Cognition, Nervous Systems, Art-Therapy
-
AI‑in‑Design & Computational Design, Parametric Design, Parametric Arts, Kinetic Arts
-
AI in Behaviorial Finance: Blockchain, DeFi Patenting, Quantitative Behavioral Finance, Financial Engineering, Researcher's Salary & Taxes Discussions
-
Venture Simulations & Agentic Computer Simulations
-
AI-XR for Virtual Try On in Fashion/Gamifications/Simulations
-
Smarthome AI/Robotic/Metamaterials Developments
AIJAM was created to publish the founding editor’s few remaining trailblazing works in computational science, unconventional experiments, the advanced concepts technologies he designs, and the weird point of view ahead of time ideas he might share on ArXiv and AIJAM repo.
If you are interested in publishing in AIJAM, the founding editor highly recommends first submitting your work to other reputable venues, conferences, journals, or arXiv. And if, by some miracle or misfortune, none of those paths work for you — then think of AIJAM and its founding editor as your unfortunate final destination to contact.
AIJAM is for researchers who don’t need to publish dozens of papers a year to prove their worth. It’s for those who cherish creating one meaningful, beautifully crafted piece of work.
This journal stands as a symbolic objection to the academic absurdities the founding editor has witnessed — a system where endless publishing metrics such as high citations or journal impact factors overshadow creativity, honesty, and mental health. Many professors may be brave enough to compete within that broken system, but few are wise enough to recognize the sinking ship — or the human cost beneath it.
Before submission, request for blockchain certification hash to get the AIJAM LaTex blockchain certification format for cover letter to editor. Then, all submissions must first be prepared in LaTeX format (we recommend using TexLive) and uploaded to arXiv in accordance with its regulations. Once available on arXiv, authors may submit the link to AIJAM for review. The first review stage is conducted by AI agent reviewers, followed by an editorial decision determining whether the paper is rejected, transferred to human reviewers, or accepted for publication.
AIJAM maintains a selective and intellectually rigorous process. Publication requires exceptional conceptual originality, strong theoretical foundations, advanced AI simulations, or significant experimental results. As such, publishing in AIJAM is more challenging than in Nature or Wiley journals, as every manuscript undergoes a unique five-step process:
Author’s request with a blockchain operation to Editor → 3x AI agent reviewers (🤖🤖🤖) based on AIIA framekwork developed by ONSOFA.ai and AIJAM → Editor’s evaluation → Human reviewer (optional) → Final decision
- Receipt of $9 USDT (TRC20 network) payments to the provided cryptocurrency wallet.
- One-page cover letter to the editor in PDF format, including #Hash Number
- Send your submitted PDF in ArXiv and LaTex file (Do NOT send us your manuscript with blockchain certification before ArXiv submission; ArXiv step is protecting you!)
- We don't have a specific format for submission. However, for ArXiv and GitHub of the AIJAM format conversion, you have to write in LaTeX (TextStudio). We don't accept MS words.
- For AI papers' initial manuscript, we highly recommend using ICML, ILRC, AMC that can be converted to AIJAM format, or use AIJAM format directly.
- Your final publications will be in AIJAM format with a blockchain #Hash certificate with attached original ArXive format you submitted to us like the example appeared on AIJAM GitHub repo.
AIJAM does NOT accept submissions by email.
To maintain privacy, transparency, and AI-integrated review, authors should submit their cover letter and ArXiv Link or manuscript (LaTeX / PDF) with #Hash certificate of payments through one of the following channels:
Contact the Editor on X social media @danielsaatchi
Alternatively, your AI-agent can contact the editor's AI agent, @DS461, on 🦞moltbook.
Alternatively, you can directly contact the editor's AI agent, 🦞@DS461, on telegram ID: @ds461_bot & submit your documents for automation integration in AIJAM [this option is locked at the moment for security reasons]
No emails. No bureaucracy. Just your work — reviewed by AI, not human gatekeepers.
AIJAM’s review process combines automation, trust, and a healthy dose of academic nonsense.
We don’t rush, and we don’t worship deadlines — but here’s how the journey usually unfolds:
| Stage | Description | Estimated Duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1️⃣ Submission (ArXiv Format) | Author submits paper in LaTeX format (ArXiv-ready). | Instant |
| 2️⃣ AI Screening (Automated Review) | Three AI reviewer agents read, analyze, and score the manuscript. They flag brilliance, bias, or boredom. | 1–7 days |
| 3️⃣ Editor Evaluation | The Editor personally reviews AI feedback and decides whether to: - Reject - Transfer to human peer-review - Accept for AIJAM publication |
7–14 days |
| 4️⃣ Optional Human Peer-Review | For papers needing additional scrutiny or humor correction, human reviewers may be invited. | 14–30 days |
| 5️⃣ Final Editorial Decision | The Editor delivers a final decision. Some papers are published instantly, others might wait until 2041. | Flexible |
| 6️⃣ Publication & Archiving | Accepted works appear on ArXiv, AIJAM GitHub, and AIJAM LinkedIn Channel. | Within 7 days of acceptance |
~3–6 weeks (or 15 years, depending on philosophical depth)
“AIJAM doesn’t chase deadlines — it chases meaning.”
If accepted, your work will appear:
- 🧾 On [arXiv] — so people can actually read it.
- 🐈 On the AIJAM GitHub — for transparency, version control, and managements.
- 🟦 On AIJAM’s LinkedIn Channel — because that’s where the real industrial-academic wars happen.
AIJAM (AI Journal of Academic Nonsense) is not a non-predatory journal (we highly suggest you submit to other journals or ArXiv).
We believe knowledge, creativity, and rebellion in science should remain open.
However, maintaining AI reviewers, digital archiving, and platform sustainability requires financial operations and editors' limited time to review.
AIJAM follows a transparent and fair tiered smart-contract model, with payments accepted only in Tether (USDT) via the TRON (TRC20) network:
| Category | Description | Fee (exclud. VAT) |
|---|---|---|
| 🧑🏻🔬 Invited Researchers & Opensource Developer by Editor | the fee will be waived, paid by Editor for NFT/blockchain purpose of AIJAM | 6 Tron (TRX) |
| 🧠 Independent / Unfunded Researchers | Open to creative, unaffiliated, or self-funded scientists who publish out of passion, not institutional pressure. | $9 USDT (TRC20) |
| 🔬 Funded Small Research Labs | Applies to projects acknowledging a small academic or private grant in their funding section. | $250 USDT (TRC20) |
| 🏢 Institutional Big Funded Projects | Applies to large-scale, well-funded, or institutional research benefiting from organizational, corporate, or governmental support. | $20,411 USDT (TRC20) |
| 🚀 Fee for Premium Process | Additional fee applies within 5 working days for fast tracking submission. | $1,460 USDT (TRC20) |
The AIJAM editor's review on cover letter cost $9 USDT because he is busy with industrial projects and have limited time; that's why he believes ArXiv is the best for your and other journals or conferences. AIJAM may waive or adjust fees in exceptional cases and editor will pay 6 TRX on Tron network for them to continue the blockchain and NFT validations in AIJAM, especially for work promoting academic reform, open science, and AI ethics.
In addition, a 37% VAT will be applied to publication fees for all researchers — except independent researchers — due to the Spanish Government’s nonsense policy that categorizes the founding editor, who was also an MSCA AI fellow, as a taxable researcher for this journal. As a result, for instance, large funded institutions will face a total charge of $27,963.07, since the Spanish Government requires researchers (including the founding editor) to pay these taxes.
“For frontiers with IQ 185+, fair for critical thinkers, and 20,411 USDT (on TRON network) for visionary institutions that can afford nonsense.”
Payment Method:
💰 Tether (USDT) on TRON Network (TRC20)
📬 Wallet address will be provided after acceptance.
AIJAM (Artificial Intelligence Journal for Autonomous Networks) integrates academic validation, blockchain certification, and open-access publishing to protect the intellectual property of independent researchers, engineers, and artists — without the high costs of national or international patent filing.
Purpose:
To enable postman-level patenting — allowing creators to timestamp, verify, and publicly disclose original inventions through open-access and blockchain technologies.
| Step | Layer | Function |
|---|---|---|
| 1️⃣ ArXiv | Academic timestamp | Establishes early public disclosure and author priority. |
| 2️⃣ NFT / Blockchain | Cryptographic proof | Certifies originality and authorship with immutable global record. |
| 3️⃣ DOI / Zenodo Option | Scholarly citation record | Registers final paper for global discoverability and reference. |
“Authors can obtain their DOI submissions from ZENDO themselves after acceptance by ArXiv and AIJAM, supporting a more decentralized AIJAM operation. Unlike traditional journals, AIJAM does not require full copyright transfer from authors and only charges for blockchain operations. Additionally, AIJAM provides NFT minting for authors’ wallets, allowing them to sell their IP NFTs directly to others. In this way, AIJAM acts as a catalyst, eliminating middlemen.”
| Feature | arXiv ID | DOI | NFT / Blockchain Hash (AIJAM Method) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Scholarly preprint identifier from arXiv.org | Persistent scholarly identifier via DataCite/CrossRef | Cryptographic record of authorship stored on a public blockchain |
| Issuer / Registrar | Cornell University Library | Publishers / DataCite / CrossRef | Public blockchain (e.g., TRON, ETH, BTC) |
| Cost to Obtain | ✅ Free | ✅ Minimal blockchain fee (< $1) | |
| Recognition in Academia | ✅ High (trusted globally) | ✅ Very high (formal scholarly standard) | |
| Timestamp Authenticity | ✅ Server-based verification | ✅ DOI metadata timestamp | ✅ Immutable on-chain timestamp |
| Proof of Authorship | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (linked to author’s crypto wallet) |
| Tamper-Proof Record | ✅ Version-controlled | ✅ Fully immutable cryptographic record | |
| Verification Platform | arXiv.org | doi.org / DataCite | TronScan / Etherscan / Blockchain explorer |
| Global Accessibility | ✅ Free and open | ✅ Free and open | ✅ Publicly verifiable worldwide |
| Citable in Literature | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | |
| Indexing (Scholar / Scopus) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ❌ Not yet indexed |
| Storage Permanence | ✅ High | ✅ High | ✅ Blockchain-permanent |
| Funding Requirement | ✅ None | ✅ None beyond minimal gas cost | |
| Use for IP Timestamping | ✅ Strong cryptographic timestamp usable as proof-of-intellectual-Ownership | ||
| Bypassing High Patent Costs | ❌ No | ❌ No | 🥇 Yes — provides prior low-cost digital proof of state of art, bypassing national and international patent fees |
| Accessibility to Researchers Without Funds | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Excellent — accessible with any crypto wallet | |
| Practical IP Protection for Independent Researchers | 🥇 Excellent — decentralized, timestamped proof of originality without legal filing barriers | ||
| Best Use Case in AIJAM | Early preprint timestamp | Formal citation record | Intellectual property preservation via blockchain verification |
AIJAM’s mission is to remove the human middlemen to democratize invention and authorship protection through open science and blockchain technology.
- 🪙 Bypass costly IPs and patent systems using blockchain timestamping and authorship verification.
- 🧬 Protect intellectual property cryptographically, linking a permanent NFT hash to each published work.
- 🌍 Ensure accessibility to independent researchers, creators, and inventors without funding or affiliation.
- 🔗 Bridge academia and decentralized networks — combining credibility (arXiv/DOI) with immutability (NFT Hash).
{
"network": "TRON",
"from_wallet": "TXXXXXXRECEIVER",
"to_wallet": "TXXXXXXRECEIVER",
"amount_trx": 6,
"status": "confirmed",
"txid": "a3f1b2c4d5e6f7890a1b2c3d4e5f67890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890",
"timestamp": "2025-11-01T14:23:45Z",
"block": 782191
}
AIJAM provides decentralized authorship verification that complements, not replaces, IPs, copyrights, or patents.
No middleman by cryptographically timestamping inventions and research papers on public blockchains, AIJAM gives underfunded researchers the ability to prove originality and authorship globally — bypassing the prohibitive costs of international patent systems while maintaining legal credibility as timestamp evidence.AIJAM is a decentralized, author-focused academic platform that allows researchers to publish, manage, and monetize their work directly. It supports open access and NFT-based intellectual property (IP) minting.
AIJAM is a platform designed to give authors control over their publications, combining open access, DOI registration, and NFT-based IP management in a decentralized model.
You can submit your work after blockchain certificate payment, submission in ArXiv, and then directly through AIJAM. Once accepted, you can obtain your DOI from ZENDO yourself, giving you full control over your publication while having ArXiv ID and a blockchain AIJAM hash number.
No. Unlike traditional journals, AIJAM does not require full copyright transfer. You retain ownership of your work and control how it is shared, sold as NFT by you mintable to your wallet.
currenlty, AIJAM charges only for open access repo and optional blockchain certification services. There are no hidden fees or mandatory copyright transfers. Please check the table for the author's budget and the institution's budget for options.
AIJAM allows authors to mint their work or IP as NFTs directly into their wallets later. These NFTs can then be sold or licensed to others, providing a direct monetization channel without intermediaries.
By letting authors handle DOI registration themselves, submitting in ArXiv by themselves, and providing direct IP monetization via blockchain certificate and NFT, AIJAM removes unnecessary middlemen and empowers authors to control their research outputs for monetization.
Yes, but note that AIJAM follows US standards. Authors in Europe or other regions should ensure compliance with local AI and IP regulations in their institutions before submitting. AIJAM does not endorse European academic nonsense and overregulations in AI.
- You keep full copyright.
- Open access is optional and transparent.
- Monetization via NFT IP is supported.
- DOI submission is author-controlled.
- The platform reduces bureaucracy and middlemen.
- Peer reviewers are anonymous AI agents, not human
Authors can reach out to AIJAM support through the founding editor's contact on X private messaging form after payments. The editor only responds if the verifiable hash number was mentioned in the cover letter and manuscript for review. If your message is not responded by the founding editor after payment, tweet him with tagging his id @danielsaatchi with #ajianhashdone and your TxID to check his direct messages. The editor hates responding to emails, wasting his time, and he prefers a quick communication channel like X social media backchannel messaging. Your accepted work will be promoted by him directly on X later. AIJAM will slowly add more automation features with a bootstrapping strategy, depending on the needs for its supporting system with advanced AI integration.