Skip to content

docs: evaluate aggregator provider provenance - #113

Merged
edithatogo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/aggregator-evaluation
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

docs: evaluate aggregator provider provenance#113
edithatogo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/aggregator-evaluation

Conversation

@edithatogo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What changed

Document aggregator-provider provenance and evaluation findings.

Validation

  • Rebased onto current origin/main
  • Existing checks for the prior PR were green
  • Generated lockfile-only residue was discarded

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 8, 2026 10:11
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📦 Bundle Size Analysis

Bundle Size
CLI 12KB
MCP Server 4KB
Total 52KB

Bundle size budget: <5MB (current: 52KB ✅)

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR appropriately documents AustLII and NZLII as evaluation-only aggregator candidates with explicit constraints that block runtime integration and redistribution. The fail-closed approach with explicit policy gates ensures legal compliance.

Critical Issue:

  • Test error handling: URL construction needs try-catch to prevent unclear test failures

The documentation structure is clear, the test validates key security requirements (HTTPS-only, evaluation-only status), and the changeset properly documents the scope. Once the error handling issue is addressed, the PR will be ready to merge.


You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

for (const candidate of fixture.candidates) {
expect(candidate.sourceUrls.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
for (const sourceUrl of candidate.sourceUrls) {
expect(new URL(sourceUrl).protocol).toBe('https:');

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛑 Crash Risk: Wrap URL construction in try-catch to prevent cryptic test failures when encountering malformed URLs. Without error handling, the test crashes with an unhelpful error instead of clearly identifying which URL is invalid.

Suggested change
expect(new URL(sourceUrl).protocol).toBe('https:');
expect(() => new URL(sourceUrl)).not.toThrow();
expect(new URL(sourceUrl).protocol).toBe('https:');

@edithatogo
edithatogo force-pushed the codex/aggregator-evaluation branch from d3c7ce8 to 1cb8bcb Compare August 8, 2026 10:32
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📦 Bundle Size Analysis

Bundle Size
CLI 12KB
MCP Server 4KB
Total 52KB

Bundle size budget: <5MB (current: 52KB ✅)

@edithatogo
edithatogo merged commit 2c9355a into main Aug 8, 2026
34 checks passed
@edithatogo
edithatogo deleted the codex/aggregator-evaluation branch August 8, 2026 10:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants