Skip to content

Diagnostic only: T04-H80 candidate content witness on interrupted restore recovery - #178

Draft
eybersjp wants to merge 177 commits into
mainfrom
test/v013-t04-h80-recovery-candidate-witness-20261101
Draft

eybersjp wants to merge 177 commits into
mainfrom
test/v013-t04-h80-recovery-candidate-witness-20261101

Conversation

@eybersjp

@eybersjp eybersjp commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Test-first diagnostic based on exact authoritative PR #92 SHA 26de8b35758540a93d58207c7b6bbfbabb6050d0. H80 regression injects missing and altered candidate descendants after an interrupted promotion journal prefix. This PR is not an integration or release authority. RED first; fix only after genuine Ubuntu/Windows CI confirms the regression. Preserve displaced original, candidate, hash-chained journal and fail-closed semantics. Physical NTFS sudden-power-loss assurance and independent reviews remain separate blockers.

@eybersjp
eybersjp changed the base branch from feature/v0.13-state-engine-v2 to main November 1, 2026 03:58

eybersjp commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

Diagnostic source-bound request for T04-H80 on commit c75ad53fcce1d3e47b1b941c922e419fb632ac2c. Please scrutinize the new candidate tree fingerprint for missing descendants, symlink traversal, file identity/size races, journal schema backward compatibility, original-root retention, Windows NTFS ACL/path behavior and recovery acknowledgement ordering. The RED test-only commit 69c7f045950405f726e33e5c77b3dcd8d26ccd57 reproduced missing-descendant false acknowledgement on both Ubuntu and Windows in CI #41271235511. The GREEN Ubuntu validation is passing; Windows is still running in #41271297676. This diagnostic review is not one of the three mandatory distinct exact-final-source code/architecture/security approvals and is not physical power-loss evidence.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-01T04:09:14.924585Z c75ad53 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: c75ad53fcc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant