Skip to content

fix(validation): bound nested conflict locations - #4896

Merged
yaacovCR merged 1 commit into
graphql:17.x.xfrom
yaacovCR:new-pr
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

yaacovCR merged 1 commit into
graphql:17.x.xfrom
yaacovCR:new-pr

Conversation

@yaacovCR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Retain at most twenty field nodes per side, favoring leaf locations when abbreviating nested conflicts.

Motivation: Bound diagnostic location aggregation.

@yaacovCR yaacovCR added the PR: bug fix 🐞 requires increase of "patch" version number label Oct 19, 2026
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yaacovCR is attempting to deploy a commit to the The GraphQL Foundation Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Retain at most twenty field nodes per side, favoring leaf locations when
abbreviating nested conflicts.

Motivation: Bound diagnostic location aggregation.
@yaacovCR
yaacovCR merged commit adaeb24 into graphql:17.x.x Oct 19, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
@yaacovCR
yaacovCR deleted the new-pr branch October 19, 2026 19:45
yaacovCR added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2026
Motivation: Retain representative conflict locations without repeatedly expanding their ancestry.

Backport of adaeb24 (#4896).
yaacovCR added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2026
Motivation: Retain representative conflict locations without repeatedly expanding their ancestry.

Backport of adaeb24 (#4896).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: bug fix 🐞 requires increase of "patch" version number

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant