Reasons for Equivalent classes

[igrangel]

The class ISO_42010_ArchitectureDescription is declared as owl:equivalentClass to the sto:StandardizationFramework, @sebbader, could you please explain which is the rationale behind this?

[sebbader]

The statements for sto:ISO_42010_ArchitectureDescription and sto:ISO_42010_Viewpoint are a first idea to map the classifications and frameworks to ISO_42010 concepts. I am not yet sure if they are really equal in the terms of owl:equivalentClass but need some type of relation.

[igrangel]

Can you link here the existing documents where the standard is explained? The source you utilized to define these classes.

[sebbader]

The official source . You can get a PDF from here.

[igrangel]

According to the official source, an Architecture description is defined as follows: "An architecture description shall identify the system-of-interest and include supplementary information as
determined by the project and/or organization. " The sto:StandardizationFramework aims to define existing Standardization Frameworks, e.g., RAMI, IIRA, but also, the Administration Shell. The idea here is to categorize any existing categorization of standards. So, I think it may be an upper concept than the Architecture description. Please, provide your opinion here.