AWS: migrate main repos - #6008
Conversation
70cb668 to
db31209
Compare
|
cc @keithmattix I'm shooting to get an approval by friday morning |
317b1d6 to
85b0e6b
Compare
85b0e6b to
5c363bc
Compare
| - istio/common-files | ||
| - istio/community | ||
| - istio/enhancements | ||
| - istio/istio |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Move do not merge protections to aws
| - istio/common-files | ||
| - istio/community | ||
| - istio/enhancements | ||
| - istio/istio |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
have auto merge come from aws
| - istio/client-go | ||
| - istio/common-files | ||
| - istio/enhancements | ||
| - istio/istio |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I should not have removed this, gcp still need to watch this, other than the aws/explicitly excluded branches
| max_size = 60 | ||
| desired_size = 1 | ||
| block_device_mappings = { | ||
| root = { | ||
| device_name = "/dev/xvda" | ||
| ebs = merge(local.gp3_root_volume, { volume_size = 256 }) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| labels = { testing = "test-pool" } | ||
| } | ||
| test2 = { | ||
| ami_type = "AL2023_x86_64_STANDARD" | ||
| instance_types = ["m7a.4xlarge", "m6a.4xlarge", "m7i.4xlarge", "m6i.4xlarge"] | ||
| capacity_type = "SPOT" | ||
| min_size = 1 | ||
| max_size = 30 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I requested an increase in our ON_DEMAND capacity. But we're going to have to do with spot instances for now.
| } | ||
| "prowjob-build-tools" = { | ||
| read = ["github_istio-testing_pusher"] | ||
| read = ["github_istio-testing_pusher", "testing_ghcr_istio"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to push to ghcr.io/istio/
| testing = "gcr.io/istio-testing" | ||
| prerelease-testing = "gcr.io/istio-prerelease-testing" | ||
| testing = "ghcr.io/istio/testing" | ||
| prerelease-testing = "ghcr.io/istio/prerelease-testing" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have yet to apply this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why the change in format? Do I need to private/delete the ones with the other format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not a change in format. We're going from gcr-> ghcr
|
@Stevenjin8: Updated the
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@Stevenjin8: Updated the following 2 configmaps:
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Chart and image both push to ghcr.io/istio/testing/ztunnel:<tag>, so whichever runs last wins the tag. Point Helm chart publishing at a /charts subpath instead. Seems to have been a typo in istio#6008.
Chart and image both push to ghcr.io/istio/testing/ztunnel:<tag>, so whichever runs last wins the tag. Point Helm chart publishing at a /charts subpath instead. Seems to have been a typo in #6008.
Since this is a big change, I'm going to wait for this pr to be approved, apply the changes, fix the things i inevitably miss, and once everything seems good, will request another review and merge.