Skip to content

Update scalafmt-core to 3.11.1#2379

Open
scala-steward wants to merge 3 commits into
johnynek:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/scalafmt-core-3.11.1
Open

Update scalafmt-core to 3.11.1#2379
scala-steward wants to merge 3 commits into
johnynek:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/scalafmt-core-3.11.1

Conversation

@scala-steward

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

About this PR

📦 Updates org.scalameta:scalafmt-core from 3.10.7 to 3.11.1

📜 GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

🔍 Files still referring to the old version number

The following files still refer to the old version number (3.10.7).
You might want to review and update them manually.

.git-blame-ignore-revs
⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scalameta", artifactId = "scalafmt-core" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.scalameta", artifactId = "scalafmt-core" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, old-version-remains, commit-count:n:3

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request contains a large number of formatting changes, primarily involving line breaks and indentation adjustments to comply with a specific code style. It also includes a version update for scalafmt to 3.11.1 and updates to the .git-blame-ignore-revs file. There are no functional changes to the codebase, and no review comments were provided.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.87761% with 420 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.27%. Comparing base (a4aa784) to head (6fb5b46).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...in/scala/dev/bosatsu/TypedExprRecursionCheck.scala 86.68% 51 Missing ⚠️
...e/src/main/scala/dev/bosatsu/SourceConverter.scala 89.94% 38 Missing ⚠️
core/src/main/scala/dev/bosatsu/tool/ShowEdn.scala 81.73% 38 Missing ⚠️
...main/scala/dev/bosatsu/cruntime/VendoredDeps.scala 40.42% 28 Missing ⚠️
...src/main/scala/dev/bosatsu/EvalBenchmarkMain.scala 0.00% 27 Missing ⚠️
...e/src/main/scala/dev/bosatsu/library/Command.scala 87.74% 25 Missing ⚠️
...in/scala/dev/bosatsu/protobuf/ProtoToBosatsu.scala 86.95% 24 Missing ⚠️
core/src/main/scala/dev/bosatsu/ValueToJson.scala 67.64% 22 Missing ⚠️
...ain/scala/dev/bosatsu/protobuf/CodeGenerator.scala 50.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
...ore/src/main/scala/dev/bosatsu/TypeValidator.scala 81.92% 15 Missing ⚠️
... and 43 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2379      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.18%   85.27%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         196      196              
  Lines       49379    49916     +537     
  Branches    12196    12272      +76     
==========================================
+ Hits        42062    42564     +502     
- Misses       7317     7352      +35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant