Skip to content

Conversation

@bvolovat
Copy link
Contributor

@bvolovat bvolovat commented Feb 9, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Optimized CI/CD workflow configuration by consolidating artifact metadata fields into a unified JSON structure for improved maintainability and clearer payload management in end-to-end testing processes.

@bvolovat bvolovat requested a review from Naor-Armo February 9, 2026 08:28
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A GitHub Actions workflow consolidates multiple artifact metadata fields (repository, run ID, name, path, and file flag) into a single SOURCE_ARTIFACT JSON object, replacing individual client_payload fields with a unified --raw-field parameter in the dispatch call.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow Payload Consolidation
.github/workflows/kubescape-cli-e2e-tests.yaml
Replaces five separate source_artifact_* client_payload fields with a single SOURCE_ARTIFACT JSON object assembled from repository, run_id, artifact name, path, and use_file inputs; updates dispatch call to pass consolidated data via --raw-field.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Naor-Armo

Poem

🐰 Five fields become one, all neat and tidy,
JSON objects dance so neat, bundled up nicely,
Source artifacts wrapped in payload so bright,
Workflow dispatches flow—everything feels right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly describes the main change: introducing a SOURCE_ARTIFACT object to consolidate artifact passing in the workflow, which aligns with the primary purpose of the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch run_test_from_private_repo

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: failure
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: failure

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: failure
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: failure

@bvolovat bvolovat merged commit 889c5f6 into main Feb 9, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants