fix: guard against short reservation id when printing shortid#1090
fix: guard against short reservation id when printing shortid#1090Olexandr88 wants to merge 1 commit intolightninglabs:masterfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a defensive programming measure to enhance the robustness of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly guards against a potential panic that could occur when printing a short reservation ID. The added check on the length of the ReservationId before slicing it is a good defensive measure. I have one minor suggestion to improve the clarity of the conditional logic, making it more idiomatic.
|
I reformatted it to follow the code style guide (formatting of fmt.Errorf). Also minimized the diff. diff --git a/cmd/loop/instantout.go b/cmd/loop/instantout.go
index 5a558f2..a071529 100644
--- a/cmd/loop/instantout.go
+++ b/cmd/loop/instantout.go
@@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ func instantOut(ctx context.Context, cmd *cli.Command) error {
fmt.Printf("Available reservations: \n\n")
for _, res := range confirmedReservations {
idx++
+ if len(res.ReservationId) != reservation.IdLength {
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid reservation id length: "+
+ "got %d, expected %d", len(res.ReservationId),
+ reservation.IdLength)
+ }
+
fmt.Printf("Reservation %v: shortid %x, amt %v, expiry "+
"height %v \n", idx, res.ReservationId[:3], res.Amount,
res.Expiry)
Could you update the PR to have just a single commit with this diff, please? |
f21f9db to
582bc5e
Compare
|
Could you rebase the PR, please? We recently enabled AI flow for low-severity PRs and this is a good candidate to validate it. |
|
Rebased on latest master |
Guard against slicing ReservationId when printing the short ID to avoid a potential panic if the identifier is shorter than expected