Skip to content

wavewalletrpc: fix the sweep_all doc comment's flag spelling - #1075

Merged
sputn1ck merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jamal/sweep-all-doc-typo
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

wavewalletrpc: fix the sweep_all doc comment's flag spelling#1075
sputn1ck merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jamal/sweep-all-doc-typo

Conversation

@jamaljsr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

The OnchainAddressRequest.sweep_all doc comment tells readers to use wavecli send --send-all, but the flag the CLI registers is --sweep-all. Anyone copying the invocation from the comment (or from the API reference the SDK generates from it) hits an unknown-flag error.

This corrects the spelling in wallet.proto and regenerates the stubs with make rpc. Comment-only, no wire or behavior change.

Flagged by review on the SDK sync PR (lightninglabs/wavelength-sdk#65), where the typo surfaces in the generated API reference data. It would be good to backport this to v0.1.x-branch so the next v0.1.1 tag carries the fix and the SDK picks it up at its next pin bump.

The OnchainAddressRequest.sweep_all comment points readers at
`wavecli send --send-all`, but the flag the CLI registers is
`--sweep-all`. Correct the spelling so the comment (and the API
reference generated from it downstream) names a flag that exists.

Comment-only change; the stubs are regenerated via `make rpc`.
@jamaljsr jamaljsr self-assigned this Jul 30, 2026
@sputn1ck sputn1ck added the backport-v0.1.x-branch Backport this merged PR to v0.1.x-branch label Jul 31, 2026
@sputn1ck
sputn1ck merged commit d94a871 into main Jul 31, 2026
36 of 38 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Successfully created backport PR for v0.1.x-branch:

sputn1ck added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
…ranch

[v0.1.x-branch] Backport #1075: wavewalletrpc: fix the sweep_all doc comment's flag spelling
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-v0.1.x-branch Backport this merged PR to v0.1.x-branch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants