Skip to content

FEAT: Adversarial Models Blog Post - #2519

Open
Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) wants to merge 29 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
ValbuenaVC:adversarial-blog
Open

FEAT: Adversarial Models Blog Post#2519
Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) wants to merge 29 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
ValbuenaVC:adversarial-blog

Conversation

@ValbuenaVC

@ValbuenaVC Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Blog post for the adversarial model benchmark (AdversarialBenchmark) in PyRIT. The blog post explains what adversarial models are, why they matter in PyRIT, and what happened when we created and ran a benchmarking scenario on them. Small datasets and graphs are attached in this PR.

Tests and Documentation

N/A. All changes are under /doc/blog.

@ValbuenaVC Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) changed the title FEAT: Blog post contents [DRAFT] FEAT: Blog post contents Aug 31, 2026
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Approved with smallish things

@ValbuenaVC Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) changed the title [DRAFT] FEAT: Blog post contents [DRAFT] FEAT: Adversarial Models Blog Post Sep 1, 2026
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_02_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
@ValbuenaVC Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) changed the title [DRAFT] FEAT: Adversarial Models Blog Post FEAT: Adversarial Models Blog Post Sep 1, 2026
@ValbuenaVC
Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2026 23:20
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated

@scooley Sarah Cooley (scooley) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added non-blocking recomendations

Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection_result_flow.png Outdated
Comment thread doc/blog/2026_09_03_adversarial_model_selection.md Outdated
@ValbuenaVC
Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2026
@ValbuenaVC
Victor Valbuena (ValbuenaVC) removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Sep 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants