Proactive Clarification Discipline skill - #210
Conversation
Decides when an ambiguous request is worth one focused clarifying question versus a stated, reasonable default, avoiding both silent wrong guesses and stalling on twenty-questions before starting work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new submission to the CAT Agent Skills gallery: “Proactive Clarification Discipline”, a general-purpose skill that guides an agent on when to ask a single clarifying question vs. proceed with an explicit, reasonable default.
Changes:
- Introduces a new
SKILL.mddefining a decision test and guardrails for clarification vs. assumptions. - Adds a human-facing
README.mddescribing intent and usage context. - Adds
metadata.jsonto register the skill in the gallery (platforms/tags/author/version).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| submissions/proactive-clarification-discipline/SKILL.md | New skill instructions and guardrails for “ask vs assume” decisions. |
| submissions/proactive-clarification-discipline/README.md | Human-facing overview and positioning of the skill. |
| submissions/proactive-clarification-discipline/metadata.json | Gallery metadata (name/description/platforms/tags/author/version/dates). |
Fixes the issues flagged in the automated review: see PR discussion for details.
|
Thanks for the thinking here, Tim (@Timziito). The "ask vs. proceed" judgment is a real one and and the preference for concrete options over open questions is a good way of thinking about it. |
Decides when an ambiguous request is worth one focused clarifying question versus a stated, reasonable default, avoiding both silent wrong guesses and stalling on twenty-questions before starting work.