Add Cowork Task Route skill - #231
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Tahir Naveed (@0xTahir) please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.
Contributor License AgreementContribution License AgreementThis Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new skill submission under submissions/cowork-task-route/ to help Cowork explain (to end users) what skills/agents/tools were invoked to complete a task, as a clear “task route” with guardrails against fabrication and sensitive-data leakage.
Changes:
- Introduces the
Cowork Task Routeskill (SKILL.md) with workflow steps, output formats, and privacy/accuracy guardrails. - Adds a human-facing gallery overview (
README.md) describing when and how to ask for a task route. - Adds catalog metadata (
metadata.json) for discovery and platform targeting (Cowork).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| submissions/cowork-task-route/SKILL.md | Adds the agent-facing skill instructions, including when to use, workflow, output format, and guardrails. |
| submissions/cowork-task-route/README.md | Adds the human-facing overview content for the gallery detail page. |
| submissions/cowork-task-route/metadata.json | Adds the submission’s catalog metadata (name/description/platforms/tags/author/version/dates). |
|
Thanks for putting this together, Tahir Naveed (@0xTahir)! Sharing thoughts I have on the use case - Cowork already provides strong detail into tool and skill usage through both through live thought process updates and the Tools section in the sidebar. On other output fields like model choice, the skill intentionally sets it to always remain as “Microsoft Copilot (powered by Microsoft AI technology)”, which is what Cowork would output by default too. This made the incremental Cowork use case a little unclear to me. The concept may be more valuable on platforms where users cannot already see tool activity or tracing. Alternatively, for Cowork, it could be positioned specifically as a shareable/saveable post-task summary (e.g. for auditing) rather than an additional source of trace transparency. It may be helpful to clarify the differentiated Cowork scenario and reconsider whether the “Model used” field adds useful information in its current form. Overall, I like the use case on trace transparency, but we probably need a reframe (or target another platform) to bring stronger added value. Hope it makes sense! Thank you. |
Summary
Adds the Cowork Task Route skill submission under
submissions/cowork-task-route.Details
SKILL.mdwith lowercase slug frontmatter matching the submission folder.metadata.jsoncatalog sidecar for the Cowork platform.README.mdoverview for the gallery page.Validation
CONTRIBUTING.mdandsubmissions/README.md.npm run check:submissionslocally because Node/npm is not installed in this environment.