Skip to content

Proposal for revised process for handling results disputes after publ…#193

Open
swasson488 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
swasson488-patch-1
Open

Proposal for revised process for handling results disputes after publ…#193
swasson488 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
swasson488-patch-1

Conversation

@swasson488

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…ication

The rules re-work task force has put together this proposed set of changes for how we handle disputes about results that have already been published by MLCommons. The proposed changes clarify and expand the existing process to cover a broader set of potential reasons for disputes (beyond just performance questions.) They also define more clearly how issues are to be escalated and adjudicated.

…ication

The rules re-work task force has put together this proposed set of changes for how we handle disputes about results that have already been published by MLCommons. The proposed changes clarify and expand the existing process to cover a broader set of potential reasons for disputes (beyond just performance questions.) They also define more clearly how issues are to be escalated and adjudicated.
@swasson488 swasson488 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 2, 2025 18:59
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

@ShriyaRishab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No concerns from Training WG.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants