Skip to content

docs: link SEP-2640 across repo and tidy Related Work table#90

Merged
olaservo merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
feature/add-extension-sep-link
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

docs: link SEP-2640 across repo and tidy Related Work table#90
olaservo merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
feature/add-extension-sep-link

Conversation

@olaservo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Wires the Skills Extension SEP's upstream submission (SEP-2640) into this repo: SEP doc header, README Repository Contents, related-work.md, approaches.md, open-questions.md, skill-uri-scheme.md. Renames the in-repo draft from SEP-0000 to SEP-2640 per the SEP naming convention (SEP number = PR number).
  • Reorders the README Repository Contents table so SEP-2640 sits after Approaches (framing → options → proposal → supporting material), and the related-work.md SEPs table so SEP-2640 leads. Strikes and moves inactive proposals (SEP-2093 rejected, SEP-2076 closed) to the bottom, with updated Approach 1 status to reflect SEP-2076's closure after the WG pivoted to the convention-based approach.
  • Adds an Open work link to the README header pointing to open PRs, so readers see that alternative proposals, decisions, and implementations are still welcome. Also inlines issue/meeting-notes links in the Open Questions row.

Test plan

olaservo and others added 9 commits April 23, 2026 19:51
- Revised links and descriptions in README.md to reflect the submitted Skills Extension SEP (PR #2640).
- Updated current status in approaches.md to indicate submission of the Skills Extension SEP.
- Clarified tracking information in open-questions.md regarding the Skills Extension SEP submission.
- Adjusted related work in related-work.md to include the Skills Extension SEP and mark a rejected proposal.
- Changed status in sep-draft-skills-extension.md to 'submitted' and updated author information.
- Enhanced skill-uri-scheme.md to indicate the incorporation of feedback into the submitted Skills Extension SEP.
Keeps the list active-proposals-first so readers aren't distracted by the
struck-out entry.

🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR #2076 was closed without merge on 2026-02-24.

🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per https://modelcontextprotocol.io/community/sep-guidelines, a submitted
SEP is named "SEP-<PR-number>". Rename in-repo references from "PR #2640"
to "SEP-2640" and update the draft doc heading from the "SEP-0000"
placeholder to "SEP-2640".

Also mark Approach 1's SEP-2076 status as closed (2026-02-24, no sponsor
found); approaches.md still listed it as "Draft, seeking sponsor".

🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closure followed the WG's decision to first explore a convention-based
approach using existing primitives, not a sponsor issue.

🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
README: move the Skills Extension SEP from the bottom of the Repository
Contents table to sit after Approaches, matching the narrative flow
(framing → options → proposal → supporting material).

related-work.md: lead the SEPs and Proposals table with SEP-2640 (this
WG's headline proposal), followed by the prerequisite PR #2527.

🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signals that alternative proposals, decisions, implementations, and
other in-flight contributions are welcome — SEP-2640 is one direction,
not the only one.

🦉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@olaservo olaservo requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2026 04:22
@olaservo olaservo merged commit 02c486e into main Apr 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants