Skip to content

fix: keep zigzag CP indexes on the activation device - #214

Merged
hjh0119 merged 1 commit into
modelscope:mainfrom
shiaho777:fix/zigzag-cp-index-device
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

hjh0119 merged 1 commit into
modelscope:mainfrom
shiaho777:fix/zigzag-cp-index-device

Conversation

@shiaho777

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

split_cp_inputs built the zigzag rank index on CPU and moved it with .cuda(). On Ascend the activation is on NPU, so index_select fails before the context-parallel slice is taken. The same .cuda() call fails when the activation is on CPU.

The index is now created on the activation's device. Rank 0 with cp_size 2 still owns chunks 0 and 3, so the token order is unchanged.

Checked with python3 -m pytest tests/test_split_cp_inputs.py. The test stubs Megatron parallel state and checks that an 8-token CPU sequence splits to [0, 1, 6, 7]. Also ran flake8 on the changed files.

split_cp_inputs built the zigzag rank index on CPU and then called .cuda().
On Ascend that index lands on CUDA while the activation is on NPU, and
index_select fails before any context-parallel slice is taken. The same call
fails on CPU. Build the two-element index on the activation device instead.

Rank 0 of cp_size 2 still owns chunks 0 and 3, so the token order is unchanged.
@hjh0119
hjh0119 merged commit 32ab2cf into modelscope:main Oct 9, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants