Repository navigation
update license - #3
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @wangxingjun778, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request simplifies the repository's licensing by removing the explicit Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to update the project's license from MIT to Apache 2.0. This is a significant change that requires careful handling. The pull request is missing a description explaining the rationale for this change, which is important for project history and transparency. More critically, the new LICENSE file appears to have an incomplete copyright notice. The Apache 2.0 license template includes a Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] line that must be filled out. While I cannot comment directly on the new file as it's not in the provided diff, this is a critical omission that must be addressed to properly apply the license.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
LICENSE.md (1-21)
Changing the project's license is a significant decision with implications for contributors and users. For transparency and to maintain a clear historical record, please add a description to this pull request explaining the motivation for moving from the MIT License to the Apache License 2.0.
No description provided.