-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
command: unset metadata key if string is empty #18377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
myQwil
wants to merge
1
commit into
mpv-player:master
Choose a base branch
from
myQwil:unset_metadata
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+8
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason why we instantiate a bstr from
ka->arghere to check forv.len == 0rather than checking!ka->arg? I.e., is it possible thatka->argpoints to a string that's just'\0'and this should also be handled?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's essentially what we're already checking when we ask if v.len == 0, since
bstr0callsstrlento determine the string's length. Either way works, i just thought this way was a little bit more readable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'm wondering if the check is redundant (i.e. we're never passed a pointer to a
\0) to turn this into thisbut if there's any chance that we do get passed a pointer to
\0as an empty string, then your way is both correct and necessaryThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no redundant check
bstr0is inlined there and the flow will be exactly the same. It's more safe this way if we ever pass "" there, and if not there is zero overhead. Also we need bstr anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, due to the inlining the compiler will fold those two checks into one, so this is strictly better. Sorry for the noise.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, it's not possible to pass, from the lua end, a value of
nil. You'll get an error saying that that's not a valid type for this property. It has to be a string (or number). So!ka->argwill never be true. You have to double-dereference it, first to get the char pointer, and then again to find out if its first character is'\0'.