Update RFC-5 status - #605
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Automated Review URLs |
jo-mueller
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2026
lubianat
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2026
Contributor
|
I'll merge it, it looks good. Thanks @kevinyamauchi |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the status of RFC-5 in the status table to "Implementation". An alternative would be "S3 update implementations), which is closer to the language in the RFC-1 flow chart, but I think "Implementation" more closely matches the language in the rest of the table.
Also, I changed the status in the RFC page to "S3" as I think "S4" is for when the first two implementations are complete and the RFC is adopted (see the RFC-1 flowchart).
cc @jo-mueller