Add provider-aware chat model picker#877
Conversation
|
Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed June 27, 2026, 2:10 AM ET / 06:10 UTC. Summary Reproducibility: not applicable. as a feature PR. Current-main source confirms the old flat raw-id picker, and the PR proof/tests exercise the new provider-aware behavior. Review metrics: 2 noteworthy metrics.
Merge readiness Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch. Rank-up moves:
Mantis proof suggestion Risk before merge
Maintainer options:
Next step before merge
Security Review detailsBest possible solution: Land the provider-aware picker after maintainers accept provider-qualified Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Not applicable as a feature PR. Current-main source confirms the old flat raw-id picker, and the PR proof/tests exercise the new provider-aware behavior. Is this the best way to solve the issue? Yes, with a maintainer contract check. The implementation is narrow and reuses the existing AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant. Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 556e7dafc4ba. Label changesLabel justifications:
Evidence reviewedWhat I checked:
Likely related people:
What the crustacean ranks mean
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics. How this review workflow works
|
|
Addressed ClawSweeper's P2 finding:
Validation after the fix:
Provider-qualified @clawsweeper re-review |
|
🦞🧹 I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again. |
Surface provider-rich model metadata in the Windows chat model picker, including default/readiness state and context labels. Preserve provider-qualified model selection, support clear-to-default via the session patch clear semantic, and serialize sends behind in-flight model changes. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preserve models that require provider authentication in the chat picker even when the gateway reports them as not configured. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep provider-qualified picker choices distinct while preserving a unique legacy raw-id cache for reconnect fallback selection. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
7ace53c to
d971a62
Compare
Summary
Change Type (select all)
Scope (select all touched areas)
winnodeLinked Issue/PR
Validation
.\build.ps1— Passeddotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Shared.Tests\OpenClaw.Shared.Tests.csproj --no-restore— Passed, 2571 passed / 31 skippeddotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests.csproj --no-restore— Passed, 1328 passeddotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests.csproj --filter "FullyQualifiedName~ChatModelChoiceTests|FullyQualifiedName~OpenClawChatDataProviderTests"— Passed, 190 passedReal behavior proof
7b02ebffOpenClaw.Tray.WinUI.exefrom the branch build output.Security Impact (required)
NoNoNoNoNoYes, explain risk + mitigation: N/ACompatibility / Migration
YesNoNoReview Conversations