Skip to content

OTA-1975: cluster-update/product-lifecycle: check for on-cluster products-data cincinnati service - #44

Open
ankitathomas wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
ankitathomas:plcc-cincinnati-service
Open

OTA-1975: cluster-update/product-lifecycle: check for on-cluster products-data cincinnati service#44
ankitathomas wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
ankitathomas:plcc-cincinnati-service

Conversation

@ankitathomas

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Signed-off-by: Ankita Thomas <ankithom@redhat.com>
@ankitathomas ankitathomas changed the title check for on-cluster producs-data cincinnati service for plcc skill [OTA-1975] check for on-cluster producs-data cincinnati service for plcc skill Jul 24, 2026
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from fao89 and hongkailiu July 24, 2026 14:04
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ankitathomas
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign wking for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ankitathomas: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/eval b37f457 link true /test eval

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@wking

wking commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retitle OTA-1975: cluster-update/product-lifecycle: check for on-cluster products-data cincinnati service

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [OTA-1975] check for on-cluster producs-data cincinnati service for plcc skill OTA-1975: cluster-update/product-lifecycle: check for on-cluster products-data cincinnati service Jul 24, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 24, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ankitathomas: This pull request references OTA-1975 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Follow-on work to support openshift/cincinnati#1072 and openshift/cincinnati-operator#270

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 29, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants