Skip to content

GBIF vs. PBot specimen numbers #392

Description

@ecurrano

I was playing around with the new GBIF integration and tried to do our integrated search for the Bighorn Basin specimen that was on the cover of Science. However, GBIF has the specimen number as "USNM PAL606436", whereas we have been using "USNM PAL 606436". Thoughts on what to do about this? The Smithsonian catalog does include the space, and I've checked with Scott about this being more correct, so it is a GBIF problem that I'm not sure we want to propagate. I'm not sure how much work it would be for Doug to remake this as a fuzzy search without spaces, but it would be confusing to do the search and keep getting no results when you know the specimen is in there. I suspect this same problem might exist also for other repositories.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions